Research Papers:
Similar cisplatin sensitivity of HPV-positive and -negative HNSCC cell lines
PDF | HTML | Supplementary Files | How to cite
Metrics: PDF 1760 views | HTML 4411 views | ?
Abstract
Chia-Jung Busch1,*, Benjamin Becker1,2,*, Malte Kriegs2, Fruzsina Gatzemeier2, Katharina Krüger3, Nikolaus Möckelmann1, Gerhard Fritz3, Cordula Petersen4 and Rainald Knecht1, Kai Rothkamm2, Thorsten Rieckmann1,2
1 Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
2 Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
3 Institute of Toxicology, University Medical Center Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
4 Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
* These authors have contributed equally to this work
Correspondence to:
Thorsten Rieckmann, email:
Keywords: HPV, HNSCC, cisplatin
Received: December 09, 2015 Accepted: April 16, 2016 Published: April 26, 2016
Abstract
Patients with HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) show better survival rates than those with HPV-negative HNSCC. While an enhanced radiosensitivity of HPV-positive tumors is clearly evident from single modality treatment, cisplatin is never administered as monotherapy and therefore its contribution to the enhanced cure rates of HPV-positive HNSCC is not known. Both cisplatin and radiotherapy can cause severe irreversible side effects and therefore various clinical studies are currently testing deintensified regimes for patients with HPV-positive HNSCC. One strategy is to omit cisplatin-based chemotherapy or replace it by less toxic treatments but the risk assessment of these approaches remains difficult. In this study we have compared the cytotoxic effects of cisplatin in a panel of HPV-positive and -negative HNSCC cell lines alone and when combined with radiation.
While cisplatin-treated HPV-positive strains showed a slightly stronger inhibition of proliferation, there was no difference regarding colony formation. Cellular responses to the drug, namely cell cycle distribution, apoptosis and γH2AX-induction did not differ between the two entities but assessment of cisplatin-DNA-adducts suggests differences regarding the mechanisms that determine cisplatin sensitivity. Combining cisplatin with radiation, we generally observed an additive but only in a minority of strains from both entities a clear synergistic effect on colony formation. In summary, HPV-positive and -negative HNSCC cells were equally sensitive to cisplatin. Therefore replacing cisplatin may be feasible but the substituting agent should be of similar efficacy in order not to jeopardize the high cure rates for HPV-positive HNSCC.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 9028