Research Papers:
Tumor hyaluronan as a novel biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study
PDF | Full Text | How to cite | Press Release
Metrics: PDF 799 views | Full Text 2512 views | ?
Abstract
Jun Gong1, Michelle Guan1, Haesoo Kim1, Natalie Moshayedi1, Sejal Mehta1, Galen Cook-Wiens2, Brent K. Larson3, Jenny Zhou1, Rishi Patel1, Isaac Lapite1, Veronica R. Placencio-Hickok1, Richard Tuli4,5, Ronald B. Natale6 and Andrew E. Hendifar1
1 Gastrointestinal and Neuroendocrine Malignancies, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
2 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
6 Lung Cancer Research Program, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
Correspondence to:
Andrew E. Hendifar, | email: | [email protected] |
Keywords: hyaluronan; hyaluronic acid; biomarker; prognostic; predictive
Received: August 04, 2022 Accepted: October 12, 2022 Published: November 02, 2022
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Hyaluronan (HA) accumulation is associated with tumorigenesis and aggressive tumor behavior.
Aims: We investigated the biomarker potential of HA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: HA levels were scored using affinity histochemistry in 137 NSCLC samples stratified by HA score ≤10, 11–20, 21–30, and >30 with HA-high defined as ≥25% expression in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tumor surface area. Overall survival (OS) and time to progression from initiation of taxane therapy (TTP) were compared using log-rank tests based on HA score.
Results: Of 122 patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC, 93 had mean HA scores that were not significantly different across clinicopathologic variables. Frequency of HA-high tumors did not differ by histology (34/68 adenocarcinomas vs. 12/25 squamous tumors, Fisher’s p = 1.0000). Median OS for recurrent/metastatic adenocarcinoma was 35.5 months (95%, 23.6–50.3) vs. 17.9 months for squamous (95%, 12.7–37.0, log-rank test, p = 0.0165). OS was not significantly different by HA quartiles, high or low (<25) HA score and tumor histology, and HA biopsy site (all p > 0.05). Median TTP (n = 98) significantly differed by HA quartile (2.8 months for HA score ≤10; 5.0 months for 11–20; 7.9 months for 21–30; 3.9 months for >30, p = 0.0265). Improved TTP trended in HA-high over HA-low tumors (n = 98, p = 0.0911).
Conclusion: In this NSCLC cohort, tumor HA level represents a potential biomarker for TTP, which remains a cornerstone of NSCLC therapy. Further validation is warranted to identify the HA accumulation threshold associated with clinical benefit.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 28304