Establishment of primary cell culture and an intracranial xenograft model of pediatric ependymoma: a prospect for therapy development and understanding of tumor biology

INTRODUCTION

Ependymal tumors are neuroepithelial malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS) that occur in both children and adults [1]. These tumors can develop along the entire neuroaxis, comprising the hemispheres, the hindbrain, and the spinal cord [2]. In children, 90% of ependymomas (EPNs) occur intracranially; two-thirds of those EPNs are located in the posterior fossa and one-third within the supratentorial compartment [3]. Considering all age groups, more than 20% of primary spinal cord tumors are of ependymal lineage [4]. The clinical behavior of ependymal tumors is highly variable, and approximately 40% of cases are incurable because of the paucity of the effective treatment options available [4, 5]. The 10-year overall survival rate is approximately 64% in pediatric patients and ranges from 70% to 89% in adult patients [4].

Despite recent improvements in neurosurgery, neuroimaging techniques and post-operative adjuvant therapy, the prognosis for pediatric EPNs continues relatively poor when compared with other pediatric brain tumors. The 5-year survival rate spans from 39% to 64%, with a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 23% to 45% [6]. In addition, late relapses up to 15 years after initial treatment are not uncommon [7]. The ability to predict patient outcome has been hampered by the heterogeneous clinical behavior of EPNs in children, insufficient recruitment into large prospective clinical trials, and contradictory studies of existing clinicopathological prognostic markers [8, 9]. EPNs are classified according to their anatomical location in nervous system (posterior fossa, supratentorial and spine); and more recently, also based on DNA methylation profiling [10].

Poor outcomes and the unpredictable behavior of this tumor in children have shifted attention to improving our knowledge of EPN biology [3]. Consequent advances have been made, including the identification of biological prognostic markers for children with intracranial EPN. The limited availability of in vitro and in vivo model systems has hampered efforts to understand EPN tumor ultramorphology, immunophenotypic markers of pluripotency in primary culture and tumor behavior. We addressed this lack by developing experimental models for EPNs that replicated the histopathological phenotypes of the parent EPN.

Yu and coworkers [11] successfully developed a xenograft model of EPN by transplanting a fresh surgical EPN tissue from a pediatric patient into the brain of immune deficient mice. Further, a permanent cell line (BXD-142EPN) was derived from a passage II of the xenograft tumor [11]. Using the same strategy, deriving cell lines by human xenograft tissue specimens, Guan et al. [12] established two EPN cell lines. Johnson and coworkers [13] developed a mouse model by selecting neuronal stem cells with a deleted Ink4a/Arf locus that overexpress tyrosine receptor ephrin (EphB2). The same group have employed this mouse EPN model in a multi-platform drug approaches to identify selective toxicity against ependymoma cells [14]. However, a straightforward protocol to derive patient-primary EPN cells would be very useful, especially if this cells could be further generate an EPN experimental model. Here, we aimed to establish EPN primary cell isolation, culture protocol and an EPN rat experimental model using these primary cells.

Considering the aforementioned limitations, the objective of the present study was to establish and characterize a primary culture of human EPN cells with the aim of advancing to a future experimental EPN model. We established the following 5-step model (illustrative Figure 1): (i) establishment of a primary culture of anaplastic EPN cells (WHO grade III), located in the posterior fossa (PF), from the PF of 1–10-year-old patients to the fourth cell passage; (ii) ultrastructural characterization of EPNs; (iii) evaluation of the expression levels of GFAP (tumor glial marker), CD133 (tumor neural stem cell marker), Nestin (immature neural stem cell marker), SSEA-3 (stage-specific embryonic antigen 3), CD44 (a cell-surface glycoprotein involved in cell-cell interactions), CD90 (stem/progenitor cell marker) and CXCR4 (CXC receptor 4, involved in tumor development and cells migration); iv) in vitro labeling of a primary culture of EPN cells with multimodal iron oxide nanoparticles (MION) conjugated to Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) MION-Rh; and v) establishment of an experimental model by intracerebroventricular infusion of EPN cells and subsequent tumor monitoring by MION-Rh detection using T2- and T2^*-weighted MRI at a field strength of 2T.

RESULTS

Establishment of a primary cell culture from EPN samples

Primary cell cultures were successfully obtained from five EPN tumor samples. The success rate of isolating EPN cell cultures from all samples was around 70%. After plating, the resulting cells were homogenous, displayed a fusiform format and were arranged in multidirectional bundles in culture (Figure 2A–2D). Figure 2 shows the profile of proliferation cell of five EPN samples from the third to the twenty-eighth day. We used all five established cellular lineages (EPN 1-5) for the experiments described within this study.

Immunophenotyping profile of EPN-initiating cells

Flow cytometric analyses showed that 76.9% of EPN cells expressed GFAP, a tumor glial marker, while 5.5% showed positive staining for CD133, and an important percentage (99.4%) of these cells also expressed CD90 (Figure 3). Low percentages of EPN cells also expressed Nestin (12.3%) and CXCR4 (8.15%), and only 3.74% of the cells showed positive staining for SSEA-3 (Figure 3). In addition, the majority (94.6%) of the EPN cells expressed CD44.

Ultrastructural characterization of EPN cells

Ultrastructural analysis of the EPN cells supported the cytological description, i.e., spindle morphology with cytoplasmic extensions (Figure 4A–4C) and oval nuclei (Figure 2A, 2B). The cell nuclei contain heterochromatin bundles and nucleoli (Figure 4A, 4B).

The main cytoplasmic characteristic exhibited by EPN cells is the presence of numerous mitochondria with evident crests, with varying morphologies, from small and electron-dense (Figure 4B, 4D, 4E, 4G, 4L) to large and elongated (Figure 4J, 4K).

A notable number of free ribosomes (many of which were rosettes) (Figure 4F, 4L), together with rough endoplasmic reticulum (Figure 4D, 4E, 4F, 4K, 4L), were evidenced in cisternae (Figure 4I) and also observed in the cytoplasm. Golgi apparatus with slightly dilated cisterns and vacuoles were observed (Figure 4H). Electron-lucid vesicles (Figure 4H), microtubules (Figure 4F) and myelinic bodies (Figure 4D, 4L) were also present. The cytoplasm contained bundant intermediate filaments (Figure 4G).

Detection of MION-Rh labeled EPN cells using a fluorescence assay

For visualization in tumorigenicity tests, EPN cells were labeled with multimodal iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated with Rhodamine-B (MION-Rh). Rhodamine-B is a fluorescent dye that can be visualized by both MRI and fluorescence imaging. The intracellular distribution of MION-Rh in EPN cells was qualitatively evaluated using fluorescence microscopy with an Rh-B filter (530 nm and 550 nm). We observed that MION-Rh nanoparticles were internalized by EPN cells and formed intracellular granules or small fluorescent red clusters (Figure 2E, 2F).

Formation of orthotopic xenograft EPN: In vivo tumor detection by imaging

The progression of tumor growth, generated after stereotaxic implantation in triplicate, of the five EPN cells samples labeled with MION-Rh (Figure 5A, 5B) into the third ventricle (Figure 5C, 5D), was visualized using combined fluorescence and X-ray detection. On day 45, fifteen tumors, from fifteen EPN injected animals, were clearly detectable due to the fluorescently labeled cells (Figure 5F). The success rate of the progression of in vivo tumor growth was around 100%.

MRI monitoring of EPNs growth by MION-Rh detection

Tumor growth was monitored using MRI analysis of MION-Rh labeled EPN cells (Figures 5E, 5G, 6A, 6C); injected unlabeled EPN cells (Figure 6B, 6D); and uninjected controls (Figure 6E). In the animals that were injected with MION-Rh-labeled EPN cells, we observed ‘dark’ hypointense zones in the T₂-weighted images (Figure 6A), and these zones were more evident in the T₂^*-weighted images (Figure 6C). In the animals injected with unlabeled EPN cells, we observed that the T₂-weighted images (Figure 6B) showed hyperintense zones in the ventricles, whereas the T₂^*-weighted images (Figure 6D) displayed hypointense signals in the same area. The control group did not show any signal alteration during MRI (Figure 6E).

Replication of the histopathological features of the original EPN

To determine whether the xenograft tumors replicated the histopathological phenotypes of the parent tumor (Figure 8), paraffin sections of xenograft tumors (EPN 1-5) were reviewed (Figure 7). The xenograft tumors displayed characteristic histological features of the original anaplastic EPN, including high cellularity, poor differentiation and cells in arrangement pseudorosettes (with classic intracellular lumens), which invaded ependymal channel light and proliferate in surrounding region. This can be visualized by histological analysis for MION-Rh detection using Prussian Blue staining.

Immunohistochemically, the xenograft tumors displayed a profile similar to that of the patient tumor, including a high proliferative (Ki-67) index (30%-60%) homogeneous high-level expression of neuronal precursor marker nestin and tumor protein p53 (Figure 8). The glial marker GFAP was highly expressed in patient and xenograft tumor (Figure 7). Expression of mature neuronal markers MAP2 and SYP were seen in isolated xenograft tumor cells (Figures 7, 8). Nearly, all the xenograft tumor cells stained strongly positive for intermediate neurofilament VIM and KI-67 including tumor cells infiltrating into normal parenchyma (Figure 7). Similar to the patient tumor, staining for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) was dot-like in the xenograft tumors (Figure 8). The overall expression of VEGF was low in the tumor cells, but strong VEGFR1 positivity was detected in tumor cells forming the perivascular pseudorosettes (Figure 8).

DISCUSSION

EPNs are relatively rare neoplasms of the CNS that mainly affect children and young adults. Little is known about the aberrant cellular and molecular processes that generate these tumors, and this lack of knowledge has hampered attempts to reduce the high mortality and morbidity rates of the disease. Thus, a disease model is necessary for understanding the biological characteristics of EPNs.

Human EPN cell lines derivation have been successfully established using xenograft tumor tissues [11, 12]. However, the high EPN heterogeneity (such as differences in tumor location, histological grade, clinical behavior, genomic profile) indicates that no single cell culture or preclinical model would entirely recapitulate their complexity. We report herein the establishment of five primary culture directly from seven samples of human pediatric EPNs in the PF. Our straightforward protocol to derive primary EPN cells would be easily usable to investigate EPN biology and explore the potential efficacy of anti-ependymoma drugs in vitro.

The obtained cells displayed a fusiform morphology and were arranged in multidirectional bundles in culture. Ultrastructural imaging revealed the presence of large numbers of intermediate glial-like filaments arranged in interwoven bundles. The vast majority of EPN cells contained cytoplasmic extensions, oval nuclei with apparent nucleoli, numerous mitochondria with evident crests; free ribosomes (many of which were present in rosettes); rough endoplasmic reticulum evidenced in cisternae, and slightly dilated Golgi apparatus. The electron microscopic results support the ependymal nature of the neoplastic cells, which is very important for critical diagnosis [15, 16].

The immunophenotypic profile of EPN cells showed that these cells expressed high levels of glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), CD44 (a marker involved in cell-cell interactions) and CD90 (a marker of stem/progenitor cells). CD90 was recently identified as a prognostic marker for high-grade gliomas and CD44 as a marker of metastatic potential [17, 18] and coworkers [19] showed that aberrant expression of the cancer stem cell markers CD90 and CD44 contributes to tumoral progression. In addition, CD90 and CD44 expression may explain the tumorigenic potential of these cells because CD44 and CD90 are also known as regulators of migration, invasion and tumor growth. Consequently, these markers may provide targets for molecular therapy in gliomas, including EPNs.

EPN cells also express low levels of CD133 (a glioma stem cell marker), nestin (a marker of immature neural stem cells), CXCR4 (CXC receptor 4, which is involved in tumor migration) and SSEA-3 (stage-specific embryonic antigen 3). Expression of CD133 and SSEA-3 demonstrates the multipotency of the EPN cells, while nestin confirms their neural origin. CXCR4 levels may be useful as a predictive marker of tumor development, growth, metastasis and a therapeutic target [20–22]. Therefore, we propose that GFAP/CD90+/CD44+ EPN cells correlate with the expression of CD133, nestin, CXCR4 and SSEA-3, which could act as markers of enrichment for tumor-initiating cells. In fact, according to our in vivo results, the GFAP/CD133+CD90+/CD44+ cells maybe the cell population responsible for EPN dissemination, leading to reduced patient survival due to the inherent chemoresistance of this tumor [17, 18, 23].

The literature describes few details about characterization of distinct immune-phenotyping on EPN. The current study, we focus on studying possible stem cell markers. A barrier to development of immunotherapeutic strategies in pediatric brain tumors is that the immunophenotype of these tumors’ microenvironment has not been defined. Other research needs to be established, since a better understanding of the immunophenotype of EPN would give support to the development of effective immunotherapeutic approaches.

We developed clinically relevant EPN animal models by directly injecting MION-Rh-labeled EPN cells into the third ventricle of immunosuppressed rats. After 45 days, the tumors could be clearly visualized using combined fluorescence and X-ray detection.

MRI analysis proved to be a valuable tool when combined with effective MION-Rh labeling techniques for monitoring the migration trajectory and EPN tumor growth over defined durations. This monitoring was performed by obtaining T2- and T2^*-weighted MRIs. In animals that were injected with MION-Rh labeled EPN cells, we observed the appearance of ‘dark’ hypointense zones in the T2-weighted images, which were more evident in the T2^*-weighted images. The presence of MION-Rh changes the magnetic susceptibility in these regions, which accounts for these ‘dark’ zones. In animals that were injected withnon-labeled EPN cells, we observed that the T2-weighted images showed hyperintense zones in the ventricles, i.e., ventricular dilatation, whereas in T2^*-weighted images, we detected hypointense signals in the same areas. Both of these signal alterations are likely due to the site of the EPN cell injection, which experienced a tissue injury followed by an edema. MRI analyses show potential for monitoring tumor growth of EPN cells efficiently labeled with MION-Rh, which functioned as an outstanding tumor contrast agent.

Following MRI acquisition, the tumor tissue was subjected to histological analysis for MION-Rh detection using the Prussian Blue protocol. Notably, MION-Rh was detected intracellularly in the labeled EPN cells, which indicated that MION-Rh had been retained but not distributed throughout the tumor tissue. This result is likely attributable to iron dilution due to tumor cell proliferation [24].

EPN cells injected into the third ventricle proliferated and migrated to the periventricular region, infiltrating the normal brain parenchyma. Likely, the GFAP/CD133+CD90+/CD44+ EPN cells infiltrated the normal brain parenchyma and have the best chance of escaping surgical resection and of becoming a source of tumor recurrence.

Our xenograft model replicated the histopathological features of the original tumor, demonstrated that this GFAP/CD133+CD90+/CD44+ EPN cells repeated in vivo transplantations, thereby maximizing the preservation of biological phenotypes of the original patient tumor, including pseudorosettes, a histological hallmark of EPN. Using human-specific antibodies, we showed that the xenograft tumor cell were all of human origin.

The cell cultures obtained in this work were able to generate tumor compatible with human anatopathological EPN pattern in spite of been grown in media containing serum (10% FBS). Serum is known to cause differentiation of primary glioblastoma stem cells [25] but it did not compromise the tumor generation potential of the EPN primary cells obtained in this work.

Recent identification of cancer stem cells in various human malignancies has provided more insight into tumor initiation, propagation and therapy resistance [26–28]. In EPNs, restricted populations of radial glial cells have been identified as candidate stem cells from various subgroups of EPNs [29, 30]. However, the limited availability of in vitro model systems has hampered efforts to understand the biology of these tumors. Successful EPN treatment requires a thorough understanding of the disease’s biological characteristics and of the behavior of its stem cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven samples of human primary anaplastic EPNs (WHO grade III) obtained from the posterior fossa of 1–10-year-old pediatric patients were submitted to resection and analysis at the Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. All patients granted their informed consent for the study, as determined by the Pediatric Oncology Institute, GRAACC - (UNIFESP- local ethical committee).

The grading of EPNs, according to existing WHO criteria, is still defined by morphological patterns (2016 CNS WHO). Nonetheless, it is expected that continuing studies of the molecular characteristics of EPNs will provide more precise and objective means of subdividing these tumors, allowing for more narrowly defined tumor groups². In this manner, the pathologic anatomy of EPNs were evaluate by stainning of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) positive, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dot-like positive, Ki67 proliferation marker above 40%, p53 positive and above 50%, intermediate filament (VIM) positive, neuron precursor (Nestin) above 30% and angiogenesis (VEGFR1) (Figure 8).

Establishment of a primary cell culture from EPN samples

Fresh seven EPN samples were washed and minced in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (1X), followed by enzymatic dissociation with 0.3% collagenase-I (Sigma-Aldrich). The isolated cells were resuspended in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium-Low Glucose (DMEM-LG, Gibco/Invitrogen Corporation) supplemented with 200 mM L-Glutamine, an antibiotic–antimycotic solution (10,000 U/mL sodium penicillin, 10,000 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate and 25 μg/mL amphotericin B - Gibco/Invitrogen Corporation) and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (Gibco/Invitrogen Corporation). Cells were subsequently seeded in 25 cm² culture flasks and maintained at 37° C, 5% CO₂ at fourth passage. The culture medium was changed every other day.

Immunophenotyping of EPN-initiating cells by flow cytometry

The cell-surface expression of specific markers in primary cell cultures of EPN at fourth passage was analyzed using commercially available human monoclonal antibodies following the manufacturers’ instructions. The cells were stained with the selected monoclonal antibodies and incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature. For intracellular staining, cells were first fixed with FACS Lysing solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and then permeabilized with Permeabilization Solution 2 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). The following human antibodies were used: - GFAP FITC, CD133 PE (clone: 133/2; Milteniy Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), Nestin APC, CD44 PE, SSEA-3 FITC, CD90 APC, and CXCR4 PE (all from BD Biosciences, Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and the related isotype controls or fluorescence minus one (FMO). Data were acquired using a FACSAria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or FlowJo Software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of EPNs

The preparation of cultured EPN cells for transmission and scanning electron microscopy was performed using ACLAR^® film. EPN cells at fourth passage adhered on ACLAR^® film were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde for two hours at room temperature and then stored at 4° C. Next, the cells were washed in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2) twice for 15 minutes each and then stored in cacodylate buffer overnight. Post-fixation was performed in 2% osmium tetroxide in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2) for 1 hour at 4° C, followed by another two 15-minute washes in the same buffer. After dehydration by incubation in ethanol (70% once and 90% twice, 15 minutes each), the cells were embedded in Epon resin diluted in propylene oxide (1:1) and incubated at 48° C with agitation for 24 hours. The cells were then transferred to pure Epon resin at 60° C for 48 hours, until the resin had completely polymerized. Semithin and ultrathin sections were obtained using a Porter Blum ultramicrotome. The ultrathin sections (70 nm) were placed on copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were studied and photographed under a TEM (Philips CM100).

In vitro EPN cell labeling with multimodal iron oxide nanoparticles (MION) conjugated to Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) (MION-Rh)

Approximately 10³EPN cells at fourth passage were plated into 24-well plates. The cells were incubated overnight (approximately 18 hours) in DMEM-LG with 40 μg Fe/mL MION-Rh at 37° C and 5% CO₂. After incubation, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were washed twice with PBS (1X) to remove residual extracellular MION-Rh. The labeled cells were treated with 0.25% TrypLE Express (Gibco/Invitrogen Corporation). Cells were immediately harvested, visualized and manually counted using 0.4% Trypan Blue (Gibco/Invitrogen Corporation) under an inverted microscope (IX51 Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Intracellular MION-Rh detection in labeled EPN cells

EPN cells at fourth passage were washed twice with PBS (1X) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The fixed cells were subsequently subjected to fluorescence analysis using diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich) to label the cell nuclei and an Rh-B filter (530 nm and 550 nm) to detect the MION-Rh. All cells were analyzed using a fluorescence microscope (IX51 Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Animal ethics statement

All the experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal experimentation determined by the UNIFESP Care Committee. This protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the UNIFESP. In addition, ethical conditions were maintained, assuming all international rules of animal care outlined by the International Animal Welfare Recommendations and in accordance with local institutional animal welfare guidelines.

Orthotopic transplantation into complex immune deficiency rats

The animals (male Wistar rats) were treated with immunosuppressant drugs, anesthetized with ketamine (55 mg/kg) and treated with xylazine (11 mg/kg) for implantation of the EPN cells. The hair was then removed from the top of the head. The animal was subsequently fixed to the stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting^®, model 51700) using in-ear and upper teeth bars. After making a skin incision on the dorsal region of the skull and removing the periosteum, a trepanation of the bone cap was performed using a dental drill. The implantation position was determined and marked on the bone according to Swanson's Stereotaxic Atlas guidelines at the following coordinates: 0.8 mm anteroposterior, 1.4 mm latero-lateral, and a depth of 3.8 mm. A Hamilton syringe was used to implant 10⁴ EPN cells at third passage in 10 μL of culture medium into the third ventricle. The cells were slowly injected over a 10-minute period. The syringe was kept in position for an additional 2 minutes before being withdrawn. The syringe was slowly raised until it was completely removed from the brain in order to avoid drawing the injected solution back into the needle. The bone was then reassembled using bone wax and the skin sutured using cotton thread. Tumor development was monitored for 45 days. Experiments were in triplicate for each EPN primary cell samples.

In vivo EPN development analysis by molecular imaging

After EPN cell inoculation, tumor development was monitored using an in vivo imaging device, Bruker model MSFXPRO. Throughout image acquisition, animals were placed in dorsal recumbency and remained anesthetized with inhaled 2% isoflurane in oxygen at 2 L/min. Initially, the skull images were acquired by X-ray. The fluorescence of the labeled cells was evaluated using the excitation (540 nm) and emission (585 nm) of MION-Rh. The images were acquired using CareStream instrument (MS FX PRO, DT, USA) and evaluated using multiplex location software.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) EPN analysis

MRI brain scans were obtained in a 2 Tesla/30 cm horizontal superconducting magnet 85310HR (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) interfaced to a Bruker Avance AVIII console (Bruker-Biospin, Ettlingen, GE) with Paravision 5.1 software (Bruker, Ettlingen, GE) (Figure 5H, 5I). A Crossed Saddle radiofrequency coil [31] was used as a head probe in animals anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (95/12 mg/kg, i.p.). A T₂-weighted RARE (Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes) sequence (TR = 5000 ms, TE = 40.5 ms, RARE factor = 8, 4 averages, 6 minutes/animal) was used in a volume of 32 × 32 × 24 mm³ covered by a 128 × 128 matrix and 2-mm slice thickness without gaps (12 slices), generating a spatial resolution of 250 × 250 μm². Immediately after RARE acquisition, a T2^*-weighted image, using a FLASH (Fast Low Angle Shot) sequence (TR = 500 ms, TE = 15 ms, flip angle = 30°, 8 averages, 6 minutes/animal) was acquired. For this image, a volume of 32 × 32 × 24 mm³ was covered by a 192 × 192 matrix and 2-mm slice thickness without gaps (12 slices), generating a spatial resolution of 167 × 167 μm². MRI was analyzed qualitatively compared to control animals. In the presence of MION-Rh-labeled EPN cells “dark” regions of hypointensity appear.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of EPN tissues

After image acquisition, the animals were anesthetized and transcardially perfused with a buffered saline solution and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The brains were removed and stored in PFA for 24 hours and cryoprotected in a 40% sucrose solution for 48 hours. Coronal sections were cut to 40 μm in thickness using a cryostat (Leica) and stained using standard procedures for hematoxylin-eosin and Prussian Blue staining and for IHC staining we used human primary antibodies included the following: antisynaptophysin (anti-SYP) (1:200), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:200), vimentin (VIM) (1:200), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) (1:100), MAP-2 (1:200), Ki-67 (1:20), p53 (1:100) (Abcam, Inc.), anti-Nestin (NES) (1:500) and VEGFR-1 (1:150) (Epitomics, Inc.). After slides were incubated with primary antibodies, the appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies were applied, and the final signal was developed using the 3,30-diaminobenzidine substrate kit for peroxidase. A negative control was performed by replacing the primary antibody with 1% BSA in PBS. The IHC staining was assessed by combining the intensity, scored as negative (–), low (+), medium (++), and strongly positive (+++) and extent of immunopositivity expressed as the percentage of positive cells.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully established and characterized in vitro and in vivo EPN models for studying the molecular pathways necessary for EPN growth and progression. Our study showed that direct orthotropic implantation of a fresh surgical specimen led to the development of a clinically relevant animal model of pediatric EPN, a tumor for which no permanent cell lines are available. We demonstrated that GFAP/CD133+CD90+/CD44+ EPN cells maintained key histopathological and growth characteristics of the original patient tumor.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge support from the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital São Paulo (HSP) - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Biochemistry and Biophysics Laboratory - Butantan Institute, São Carlos Institute of Physics São Paulo University, Brazil and Electron Microscopy Center - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Korshunov A, Witt H, Hielscher T, Benner A, Remke M, Ryzhova M, Milde T, Bender S, Wittmann A, Schöttler A, Kulozik AE, Witt O, von Deimling A, et al. Molecular staging of intracranial ependymoma in children and adults. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:3182–3190.

2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 131:803–820.

3. Kilday JP, Rahman R, Dyer S, Ridley L, Lowe J, Coyle B, Grundy R. Pediatric ependymoma: biological perspectives. Mol Cancer Res. 2009; 7:765–786.

4. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Rouse C, Chen Y, Dowling J, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan J. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro-oncol. 2014; 16:iv1–63.

5. Gajjar A, Pfister SM, Taylor MD, Gilbertson RJ. Molecular insights into pediatric brain tumors have the potential to transform therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20:5630–5640.

6. Zacharoulis S, Levy A, Chi SN, Gardner S, Rosenblum M, Miller DC, Dunkel I, Diez B, Sposto R, Ji L, Asgharzadeh S, Hukin J, Belasco J, et al. Outcome for young children newly diagnosed with ependymoma, treated with intensive induction chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007; 49:34–40.

7. Paulino AC, Wen BC, Buatti JM, Hussey DH, Zhen WK, Mayr NA, Menezes AH. Intracranial ependymomas: an analysis of prognostic factors and patterns of failure. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002; 25:117–122.

8. Hamilton RL, Pollack IF. The molecular biology of ependymomas. Brain Pathol. 1997; 7:807–822.

9. Tabori U, Vukovic B, Zielenska M, Hawkins C, Braude I, Rutka J, Bouffet E, Squire J, Malkin D. The role of telomere maintenance in the spontaneous growth arrest of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Neoplasia. 2008; 8:136–142.

10. Pajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, Jones DT, Hovestadt V, Kratochwil F, Wani K, Tatevossian R, Punchihewa C, Johann P, Reimand J, Warnatz HJ, Ryzhova M, et al. Molecular Classification of Ependymal Tumors across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades and Age Groups. Cancer Cell. 2015; 27:728–743.

11. Yu L, Baxter PA, Voicu H, Gurusiddappa S, Zhao Y, Adesina A, Man TK, Shu Q, Zhang YJ, Zhao XM, Su JM, Perlaky L, Dauser R, et al. A clinically relevant orthotopic xenograft model of ependymoma that maintains the genomic signature of the primary tumor and preserves cancer stem cells in vivo. Neuro-oncol. 2010; 12:580–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nop056.

12. Guan S, Shen R, Lafortune T, Tiao N, Houghton P, Yung WK, Koul D. Establishment and characterization of clinically relevant models of ependymoma: a true challenge for targeted therapy. Neuro-oncol. 2011; 13:748–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor037.

13. Johnson RA, Wright KD, Poppleton H, Mohankumar KM, Finkelstein D, Pounds SB, Rand V, Leary SE, White E, Eden C, Hogg T, Northcott P, Mack S, et al. Cross species genomics matches driver mutations and cell compartments to model ependymoma. Nature. 2010; 466:632–636.

14. Atkinson JM, Shelat AA, Carcaboso AM, Kranenburg TA, Arnold LA, Boulos N, Wright K, Johnson RA, Poppleton H, Mohankumar KM, Féau C, Phoenix T, Gibson P, et al. An integrated in vitro and in vivo high throughput screen identifies treatment leads for ependymoma. Cancer Cell. 2011; 20:384–399.

15. Goebel HH, Cravioto H. Ultrastructure of human and experimental ependymomas. A comparative study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1972; 31:54–71.

16. Liberski P. The ultrastructure of ependymoma: personal experience and the review of the literature. Folia Neuropathol. 1996; 34:212–220.

17. Donnenberg VS, Donnenberg AD, Zimmerlin L, Landreneau RJ, Bhargava R, Wetzel RA, Basse P, Brufsky AM. Localization of CD44 and CD90 positive cells to the invasive front of breast tumors. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2010; 78:287–301.

18. He J, Liu Y, Zhu T, Dimeco F, Vescovi AL, Heth JA, Muraszko KM, Fan X, Lubman DM. CD90 is identified as a candidate marker for cancer stem cells in primary high-grade gliomas using tissue microarrays. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012; 11:M111.010744.

19. Bahnassy AA, Zekri AR, El-Bastawisy A, Fawzy A, Shetta M, Hussein N, Omran D, Ahmed AA, El-Labbody SS. Circulating tumor and cancer stem cells in hepatitis C virus-associated liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:18240–48.

20. Ehtesham M, Min E, Issar NM, Kasl RA, Khan IS, Thompson RC. The role of the CXCR4 cell surface chemokine receptor in glioma biology. J Neurooncol. 2013; 113:153–162.

21. Gagliardi F, Narayanan A, Reni M, Franzin A, Mazza E, Boari N, Bailo M, Zordan P, Mortini P. The role of CXCR4 in highly malignant human gliomas biology: current knowledge and future directions. Glia. 2014; 62:1015–1023.

22. Tang W, Wang X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Chen Y, Lin Z. CXCL12 and CXCR4 as predictive biomarkers of glioma recurrence pattern after total resection. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2015; 63:190–98.

23. Meco D, Servidei T, Lamorte G, Binda E, Arena V, Riccardi R. Ependymoma stem cells are highly sensitive to temozolomide in vitro and in orthotopic models. Neuro-oncol. 2014; 16:1067–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou008.

24. Zhang F, Xie J, Liu G, He Y, Lu G, Chen X. In vivo MRI tracking of cell invasion and migration in a rat glioma model. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011; 13:695–701.

25. Lee J, Kotliarova S, Kotliarov Y, Li A, Su Q, Donin NM, Pastorino S, Purow BW, Christopher N, Zhang W, Park JK, Fine HA. Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell. 2006; 9:391403.

26. Hemmati HD, Nakano I, Lazareff JA, Masterman-Smith M, Geschwind DH, Bronner-Fraser M, Kornblum HI. Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100:15178–83.

27. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, Dirks PB. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003; 63:5821–5828.

28. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Hide T, Dirks PB. Cancer stem cells in nervous system tumors. Oncogene. 2004; 23:7267–7273.

29. Taylor MD, Poppleton H, Fuller C, Su X, Liu Y, Jensen P, Magdaleno S, Dalton J, Calabrese C, Board J, Macdonald T, Rutka J, Guha A, et al. Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma. Cancer Cell. 2005; 8:323–335.

30. Poppleton H, Gilbertson RJ. Stem cells of ependymoma. Br J Cancer. 2007; 96:6–10.

31. Papoti D, Vidoto EL, Martins MJ, Tannús A. Effects of crossing saddle coil conductors: Electric length X mutual inductance. Concepts Magn Reson. 2010; 37B:193–201.