Oncotarget

Research Papers:

NR2B-containing NMDA receptors contribute to diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

PDF |  HTML  |  Supplementary Files  |  How to cite

DOI pending

Metrics: PDF 381 views  |   HTML 1034 views  |   ?  

Wenxue Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, Qingqing Qi, Xin Long, Yueyue Li, Peng Wang, Yanbo Yu, Lixiang Li, Yiyuan Sun, Zhen Li, Yanqing Li and Xiuli Zuo _

Abstract

Wenxue Zhang1,2,3,4, Dongyan Zhao5, Qingqing Qi1,2, Xin Long1,2, Yueyue Li1,2, Peng Wang1,2, Yanbo Yu1,2, Lixiang Li1,2, Yiyuan Sun1,2, Zhen Li1,2, Yanqing Li1,2 and Xiuli Zuo1,2

1Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China

2Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China

3Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China

4Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China

5Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Puyang Oilfield, Puyang 457000, China

Correspondence to:

Xiuli Zuo, email: [email protected]

Keywords: NMDARs; NR2B; proBDNF; visceral hypersensitivity; diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Received: December 01, 2016     Accepted: January 02, 2018     Published: January 02, 2018

ABSTRACT

Colonic mucosal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) contribute to visceral hypersensitivity in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) by increasing the production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). We investigated which of the multiple NMDAR subtypes and BDNF isoforms are responsible for this effect. Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting were used to detect levels of colonic mucosal NR2A-D subunits and the precursor (proBDNF) and mature (mBDNF) forms of BDNF in 67 participants. Only NR2B subunit expression was elevated in the colonic mucosa of IBS-D patients, in parallel with increased total BDNF and proBDNF expression. Expression of 15 kDa mBDNF was not detected in the colonic mucosa. NR2B, total BDNF and proBDNF levels correlated with abdominal pain scores. Quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting showed that NMDAR activation substantially induced total BDNF/proBDNF expression in HT-29 cells, while the NMDAR inhibitor MK-801 and the NR2B subunit antagonist Ro25-6981 each completely blocked these effects. Thus, colonic mucosal NR2B-containing NMDARs may contribute to visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D patients by upregulating BDNF, especially proBDNF.


INTRODUCTION

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional gastrointestinal disorder, and involves abdominal pain, discomfort or bloating associated with changes in bowel habits [1]. IBS affects 9.8–12.8% of the population [2] and markedly reduces the quality of life [3]. In the Rome III criteria, four subtypes of IBS are described: diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D), IBS with constipation, mixed-type IBS, and unsubtyped IBS. Among these subtypes, the diarrhea subtype especially impairs patients’ quality of life by limiting their diet and their ability to travel or eat out [4]. Visceral hypersensitivity has been recognized as a crucial mechanism in IBS-D [5].

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are heterotetramers that require the assembly of two NMDA receptor 1 (NR1) subunits with either two NR2 subunits (NR2A, NR2B, NR2C and NR2D) or a mixture of NR2 and NR3 subunits (NR3A and NR3B) [6, 7]. The variety of subunit combinations results in a large number of NMDAR subtypes, and the NR2 (A-D) subunits are major determinants of the functional heterogeneity of the receptors [8]. Previous studies have demonstrated that mucosal NMDARs in the colon contribute to the visceral hypersensitivity in IBS by increasing the production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [9]. Therefore, mucosal NMDAR-targeting drugs could be developed as effective therapies. However, NMDARs have multiple functions in the gastrointestinal tract. Loss of NR2D-containing receptors by siRNA knockdown reduced vascular endothelial cell migration, tube formation and transmigration [10], suggesting that the complete inhibition of NMDARs could have serious side effects. The targeted inhibition of NMDAR subtypes could avoid the side effects of NMDAR guided therapies for IBS. However, it remains unclear which NMDAR subtype contributes to the visceral hypersensitivity in IBS.

BDNF is a neurotrophin with multiple biological effects in the nervous system, including neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity and pain [1113]. Previous studies have demonstrated that BDNF expression is markedly elevated in the colonic mucosa of IBS-D patients and contributes to colonic hypersensitivity [1416]. Like other neurotrophins, BDNF is initially synthesized as a precursor [1719]. The precursor of BDNF (proBDNF) is not merely an intermediate in the synthesis of mature BDNF (mBDNF), but rather has its own biological functions [20]. In the central nervous system, proBDNF binds to its receptor, p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR), and exerts some functions that oppose the functions of mBDNF. For example, in contrast to mBDNF, proBDNF can promote neuronal apoptosis and negatively regulate spine density [20, 21]. However, the expression of proBDNF and mBDNF have not yet been measured in the colonic mucosa of patients with IBS-D.

In this study, we assessed which of the NMDAR subtypes and BDNF isoforms in the colonic mucosa contribute to the visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D.

RESULTS

Subjects

In total, 32 IBS-D patients (15 females, mean age 46.47 ± 14.84 years) and 35 control subjects (20 females, mean age 52.09 ± 10.55 years) were enrolled in this study (Table 1). The IBS-D and control groups did not differ significantly in age (P = 0.077) or sex (P = 0.401). On the whole, IBS-D patients had significantly higher abdominal pain/discomfort severity (P < 0.0001) and frequency (P < 0.0001) scores than healthy controls.

Table 1: Demographics and baseline characteristics of the groups

Patient group

Age (y) Mean ± SD

Gender M/F

BMI (kg/m2) Mean ± SD

Severity of abdominal pain/discomfort

Frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort

HC

52.09 ± 10.55

15/20

24.70 ± 3.57

0.14 ± 0.36

0.23 ± 0.43

IBS-D

46.47 ± 14.84

17/15

24.39 ± 3.40

2.16 ± 0.88

2.81 ± 1.06

P value

0.077

0.401

0.718

<0.001

<0.001

HC, healthy control; IBS-D, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome; y, years; M, male; F, female; BMI, body mass index.

Only NR2B subunit expression was elevated in the colonic mucosa of IBS-D patients

Immunohistochemical staining revealed NR2 (A-D) subunit immunoreactivity primarily in colonic epithelial cells (Figure 1A). Quantification indicated that the immunohistochemical staining for NR2B was stronger in IBS-D patients (0.034 ± 0.011 integrated optical density [IOD]/area) than in healthy controls (0.028 ± 0.010 IOD/area; P = 0.048). However, there were no differences in NR2A, NR2C or NR2D expression between the two groups (Figure 1B).

Only NR2B subunit expression was elevated in the colonic mucosa of IBS-D patients.

Figure 1: Only NR2B subunit expression was elevated in the colonic mucosa of IBS-D patients. (A) Representative images of NR2 (A–D)-immunoreactive cells in colonic mucosal tissues from healthy controls (HC) or diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) patients. Magnification 20×, scale bar 50 μm. (B) Results of immunohistochemical analysis. (C) Representative bands of Western blots from HC, IBS-D patients or the positive control (PC, mouse brain tissue). (D) Results of Western blot analysis. n = 35 for HC, n = 32 for IBS-D. Data are presented as means ± SDs. *P < 0.05 versus control; **P < 0.01 versus control (Student’s t test).

Western blotting revealed that NR2B levels were 1.5-fold greater in IBS-D patients (87.49 ± 47.42%) than in healthy controls (58.15 ± 29.45%, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences between the IBS-D patients and controls in the expression of NR2A (33.36 ± 26.94% vs. 39.67 ± 43.34%, P = 0.481), NR2C (42.06 ± 17.68% vs. 39.92 ± 15.48%, P = 0.599) or NR2D (66.80 ± 49.59% vs. 64.33 ± 46.83%, P = 0.835) (Figure 1C and 1D).

Mucosal BDNF expression was elevated in IBS-D patients and correlated with NR2B expression

As reported previously [9], mucosal BDNF expression was higher in IBS-D patients than in healthy controls (139.00 ± 11.90% vs. 91.89 ± 5.98%, P < 0.001; Supplementary Figure 1A). BDNF expression correlated positively with NR2B expression in the mucosa (healthy controls: r = 0.335, P = 0.050; IBS-D patients: r = 0.407, P = 0.021; all subjects: r = 0.550, P < 0.001; Figure 2A).

Mucosal BDNF and NR2B levels correlated with abdominal pain scores

Mucosal NR2B levels correlated with

Figure 2: Mucosal NR2B levels correlated with BDNF levels and abdominal pain scores. (A) Pearson’s correlation between colonic mucosal NR2B and BDNF protein levels in (a) healthy controls (HC, r = 0.335, P = 0.050), (b) IBS-D patients (r = 0.407, P = 0.021) and (c) all subjects (AS, r = 0.550, P < 0.001). (B) Scatter plots depicting the correlation between NR2B levels and the severity of abdominal pain/discomfort in (a) healthy controls (r = 0.404, P = 0.016), (b) IBS-D patients (r = 0.630, P < 0.001) and (c) all subjects (r = 0.720, P < 0.001), and the correlation between NR2B levels and the frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort in (d) healthy controls (r = 0.586, P < 0.001), (e) IBS-D patients (r = 0.459, P = 0.008) and (f) all subjects (r = 0.712, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis was performed with Spearman’s rank correlation.

Mucosal NR2B levels correlated significantly with the severity of abdominal pain/discomfort (controls: r = 0.404, P = 0.016; IBS-D patients: r = 0.630, P < 0.001; all subjects: r = 0.720, P < 0.001; Figure 2B) and the frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort (controls: r = 0.586, P < 0.001; IBS-D patients: r = 0.459, P = 0.008; all subjects: r = 0.712, P < 0.001; Figure 2B). Mucosal BDNF levels also correlated with abdominal pain scores (Supplementary Figure 1C).

BDNF expression was induced by an NMDAR agonist

NMDA, alone or in combination with D-serine, can activate NMDARs [7, 22, 23]. As shown in Figure 3A, activating the NMDARs with NMDA (with/without D-serine) increased BDNF mRNA expression in HT29 cells. In HT29 cells exposed to 10 μM D-serine, NMDA dose-dependently upregulated BDNF (Figure 3A). Likewise, treatment of HT29 cells with NMDA and D-serine increased BDNF protein levels, which declined to control levels by 24 hours (Figure 3B and 3C).

BDNF expression was induced by NMDAR agonist.

Figure 3: BDNF expression was induced by NMDAR agonist. (A) BDNF mRNA expression at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours with different concentrations of NMDA and/or D-serine(n ≥ 5). (B) Representative Western blot bands after the addition of NMDA and/or D-serine. PC: positive control. (C) Results of densitometric analysis (n = 3). Data are presented as means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01; NS: not significant (one-way ANOVA, Tukey tests).

MK-801 and Ro25-6981 each completely blocked BDNF expression in cells treated with NMDA and D-serine

MK-801 (a selective and high-affinity NMDAR antagonist) and Ro25-6981 (a selective and high-affinity NR2B subunit antagonist) have been used extensively to block NMDARs and the NR2B subunit, respectively [2427]. Preincubation of HT29 cells with MK-801 or Ro25-6981 abolished the effect of NMDA and D-serine on BDNF mRNA expression (Figure 4A), indicating that the receptor containing the NR2B subunit was responsible for BDNF mRNA expression.

MK-801 and Ro25-6981 each completely blocked BDNF expression.

Figure 4: MK-801 and Ro25-6981 each completely blocked BDNF expression. (A) MK-801 or Ro25-6981 was used to block the NR1 subunit or the NR2B subunit, respectively. Changes in BDNF mRNA expression were measured by qPCR (n ≥ 5). (B) Representative Western blot bands after the addition of NMDA, D-serine, MK-801 or Ro25-6981. (C) Results of densitometric analysis (n = 3). Data are presented as means ± SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control; NS: not significant (one-way ANOVA, Tukey tests).

Likewise, while BDNF protein expression in HT29 cells doubled following NMDA and D-serine exposure, it was reduced to the control level when the NMDARs were blocked with MK-801 and when NR2B was blocked with Ro25-6981 (Figure 4B and 4C).

Mucosal proBDNF levels were elevated in IBS-D patients and correlated with NR2B levels

Immunohistochemical staining revealed proBDNF immunoreactivity primarily in colonic epithelial cells (Figure 5A). Quantification demonstrated that immunohistochemical staining for proBDNF was stronger in IBS-D patients (0.041 ± 0.002 IOD/area) than in healthy controls (0.031 ± 0.002 IOD/area; P < 0.001) (Figure 5B). Western blotting indicated that mucosal proBDNF levels were substantially higher in IBS-D patients than in healthy controls (72.19 ± 30.25% vs. 55.93 ± 26.82%, P = 0.023, Figure 5C). ProBDNF expression correlated with NR2B expression (healthy controls: r = 0.385, P = 0.022; IBS-D patients: r = 0.547, P = 0.002; all subjects: r = 0.623, P < 0.001; Figure 5D).

Mucosal proBDNF expression was elevated in IBS-D patients and correlated with NR2B levels and abdominal pain scores.

Figure 5: Mucosal proBDNF expression was elevated in IBS-D patients and correlated with NR2B levels and abdominal pain scores. (A) Representative images of proBDNF-immunoreactive cells in colonic mucosal tissues from healthy controls (HC) or diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) patients. Magnification 20×, scale bar 50 μm. (B) Results of immunohistochemical analysis. (C) Western blot analysis of proBDNF in mucosal biopsies. PC: positive control. (D) Pearson’s correlation between colonic mucosal NR2B and proBDNF protein levels in (a) healthy controls (r = 0.385, P = 0.022), (b) IBS-D patients (r = 0.547, P = 0.002) and (c) all subjects (AS, r = 0.623, P < 0.001). (E) Scatter plots depicting the correlation between proBDNF levels and the severity of abdominal pain/discomfort in (a) control subjects (r = 0.340, P = 0.046), (b) IBS-D patients (r = 0.653, P < 0.001) and (c) all subjects (r = 0.638, P < 0.001), and the correlation between proBDNF levels and the frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort in (d) control subjects (r = 0.418, P = 0.013), (e) IBS-D patients (r = 0.572, P = 0.001) and (f) all subjects (r = 0.655, P < 0.001). n = 35 for HC, n = 32 for IBS-D. Data are presented as means ± SDs. *P < 0.05 versus control; **P < 0.01 versus control (Student’s t test).

ProBDNF levels correlated with abdominal pain scores

In all the patient groups, mucosal proBDNF expression correlated with the severity of abdominal pain/discomfort (controls: r = 0.340, P = 0.046; IBS-D patients: r = 0.653, P < 0.001; all subjects: r = 0.638, P < 0.001; Figure 5E) and the frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort (controls: r = 0.418, P = 0.013; IBS-D patients: r = 0.572, P = 0.001; all subjects: r = 0.655, P < 0.001; Figure 5E).

NR2B activation induced proBDNF protein expression

After the addition of NMDA with/without D-serine to HT29 cells, proBDNF expression increased, and then decreased to the control level by 24 hours (Figure 6A and 6B). Likewise, while proBDNF expression in HT29 cells increased 1.9-fold following NMDA and D-serine exposure, it decreased to the control level when NMDA receptor activation was inhibited with MK-801 or Ro25-6981 (Figure 6C and 6D).

ProBDNF protein expression in HT29 cells was induced by NMDARs.

Figure 6: ProBDNF protein expression in HT29 cells was induced by NMDARs. (A, C) Representative Western blot bands after the addition of NMDA, D-serine, MK-801 or Ro25-6981. (B, D) Results of densitometric analysis. Data are presented as means ± SDs (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus control; ##P < 0.01; NS: not significant (one-way ANOVA, Tukey tests). PC: positive control.

Mucosal mBDNF expression at 15 kDa was not detected

As shown in Supplementary Figure 1B, a band at 15 kDa corresponding to mBDNF was observed in brain tissue, but not in the colonic mucosa.

DISCUSSION

Previous studies in three kinds of research subjects (clinical patients, mice and cultured cells) have demonstrated that the activation of colonic mucosal NMDARs contributes to the visceral hypersensitivity in IBS by increasing the production of BDNF [9, 28]. In the present study, we confirmed that the NR2 (A-D) subunits were expressed in the colonic mucosa, but we found that only NR2B subunit expression was elevated in IBS-D patients. NR2B expression correlated positively with abdominal pain scores and BDNF expression. Accordingly, both an NMDAR antagonist and an NR2B subunit antagonist completely abolished the induction of BDNF expression by an NMDAR agonist, indicating that the receptor containing the NR2B subunit was responsible for BDNF expression. These findings confirmed the critical involvement of the NR2B subunit in visceral hypersensitivity.

A growing number of people suffer from IBS, but the pathophysiological mechanism of IBS is complex and poorly understood. In addition, conventional drugs are still limited in clinical practice because of their side effects [29, 30], and some drugs have even been withdrawn from the market due to severe adverse events [31, 32]. The development of novel medications that act locally in the gastrointestinal tract is a promising way to overcome this problem. A recent study demonstrated that NMDARs were markedly upregulated in the colonic mucosa of IBS patients and contributed to colonic hypersensitivity [9]. A colon-targeted NMDAR antagonist would be a new approach to attenuating abdominal pain in IBS patients. However, NMDARs exist as multiple subtypes and have multiple biological functions in the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, targeted inhibition of an NMDAR subtype would be a better way to avoid side effects.

NMDARs have primarily been studied as neuronal ionotropic glutamate receptors, and have multiple functions in the nervous system [7]. All NMDAR subtypes are thought to combine two copies of the obligatory NR1 subunit with two copies of NR2 and/or NR3 subunits. The subunit composition of an NMDAR determines its receptor subtype. To date, seven different subunits have been identified, which fall into three subfamilies: the NR1 subunit, four NR2 subunits (NR2A, NR2B, NR2C and NR2D) and a pair of NR3 subunits (NR3A and NR3B) [8]. Among these subunits, the four NR2 subunits are major determinants of the functional heterogeneity of the receptors. Thus, we investigated the effects of the NMDAR subtypes by studying the NR2 subunits.

In the nervous system, NMDARs containing the NR2B subunit are critical for anterior cingulate cortex sensitization and visceral pain responses in viscerally hypersensitive rats [33]. In our study, we confirmed that the NR2B NMDA receptor subtype in the colonic mucosa was responsible for the pathogenesis of visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D, as it increased the production of BDNF. The administration of an NR2B antagonist could inhibit visceral hypersensitivity in the central nervous system and the colon at the same time.

BDNF is a neurotrophin with multiple functions. Members of the neurotrophin family are initially synthesized as 31-35-kDa precursors, which are subsequently cleaved, yielding mature 13.2–15.9-kDa neurotrophins [34]. In accordance with previous studies [35, 36], three bands were evident on our Western blot membrane: the 35-kDa proBDNF, the 28-kDa mixture, and the 15-kDa mBDNF. The band at 28 kDa corresponded to truncated proBDNF and the mBDNF dimer [14, 15].

In the central nervous system, mBDNF promotes pain through central sensitization; thus, neutralizing the increased spinal mBDNF could attenuate pain processing [37, 38]. However, peripheral proBDNF, but not mBDNF, exacerbates inflammatory, visceral, surgical pain in the peripheral nervous system [39]. To investigate the function of BDNF in the gastrointestinal tract, we examined proBDNF and mBDNF expression in the colonic mucosa. ProBDNF expression was upregulated in the colonic mucosa of the IBS-D group and correlated with abdominal pain scores. However, mBDNF expression at 15 kDa was not detected in the colonic mucosa, while a band was detected in the positive control. These findings suggested that proBDNF may exacerbate visceral pain in the gastrointestinal tract. However, our study was a preliminary evaluation, and further research in this area is warranted.

In the peripheral tissues, proBDNF secretion by inflammatory cells correlates highly with pain [39, 40]. In addition, low-grade inflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of IBS. However, upon its upregulation, proBDNF was highly distributed in colonic epithelial cells. Thus, it is unlikely that proBDNF contributes to abdominal pain in IBS as an inflammatory mediator.

In recent years, NMDARs and BDNF have been discovered to induce visceral pain hypersensitivity [4144]. It is well known that NMDARs regulate BDNF expression and secretion [4547]. BDNF participates in colitis-induced spinal central sensitization by upregulating NR1 phosphorylation [48], suggesting that BDNF modulates NMDAR activity in the spinal cord. The interaction between NMDARs and BDNF in visceral hypersensitivity should be further studied.

In neuronal and vascular cells, protein metabolites such as amino acids and ammonia can activate NMDARs [7, 22]. However, in the colonic mucosa, it is unclear which component of feces induces the expression of BDNF by activating NMDARs. Moreover, NMDARs may contribute to the pathogenesis of IBS through other mechanisms. NMDARs regulate diverse processes such as apoptosis, immune responses, arterial dilation, etc. [22, 4951]. A previous study demonstrated that NMDARs linked ammonia with gastric epithelial cell death [27]. Multiple mechanisms contribute to IBS symptoms, including altered visceral sensitivity and pain processing, motility disorders, altered microbiota, low-grade inflammation and increased mucosal permeability [52]. Excessive apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells increases mucosal permeability [53]. It remains unclear whether NMDARs contribute to epithelial barrier dysfunction in IBS-D.

In summary, we demonstrated that the NR2B NMDA receptor subtype in the colonic mucosa contributes to the visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D by increasing the production of BDNF, especially proBDNF. Thus, NR2B and proBDNF could be considered as potential therapeutic targets for IBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

The protocol for this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital, Shandong University (NO.KYLL-2013-087), and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02512146). The diagnosis of IBS-D was made by an experienced gastroenterologist based on the Rome III criteria [54]. The healthy controls were patients undergoing endoscopies for polyps and cancer screening, with negative results. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of abdominal surgery; alarm symptoms such as anemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, marked weight loss or abdominal masses; coagulopathy, serious organic disease or impaired cardiac, liver or renal function; pregnancy or breastfeeding; and unwillingness to sign the informed consent form. Human mucosal biopsies were obtained from the rectosigmoid junction of patients undergoing colonoscopies at the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Shandong, China). The evaluation included a detailed history, routine blood analysis, tests of blood clotting, thyroid and liver function, an abdominal ultrasound, a colonoscopy and a mucosal biopsy (to exclude microscopic colitis).

Assessment of abdominal pain/discomfort

IBS-D patients were asked to score their abdominal symptoms over the previous two weeks using a validated questionnaire described previously [9, 15, 55]. According to its impact on the patient’s daily activities, the severity of abdominal pain/discomfort was graded from 0 (absent) to 4 (extremely severe, precluding daily activities). The frequency of abdominal pain/discomfort was graded from 0 (absent) to 4 (daily), according to the frequency of symptoms per week.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded sections (4 μm) of human mucosal biopsies were collected on gelatin-coated slides. Tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated in gradient alcohol. After being steamed in sodium citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0) for 20 min at 92–98°C for antigen retrieval, the sections were treated with hydrogen peroxide (3% v/v) for 20 min to quench the endogenous peroxidase activity. Thereafter, the slides were blocked with normal goat serum (Zhongshan Gold Bridge, Beijing, China) and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies were detected with a biotin-streptavidin horseradish peroxidase detection system (Zhongshan Gold Bridge, Beijing, China) and diaminobenzidine as the chromogen [9, 56]. For the negative control tissue sections, the primary antibody was replaced with phosphate-buffered saline. Sections from mouse brain tissue were used as a positive control. The primary antibodies used in this study were as follows: anti-NR2A (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-NR2B (1:200; Abcam), anti-NR2C (1:250; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), anti-NR2D (1:150; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-proBDNF (1:30; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Images were obtained under a light microscope (Olympus, BX53), and four 40× TIFF-format images of randomly selected non-overlapping fields from each section were analyzed in a blinded manner. Image-pro Plus 6.0 software was used to calculate the average IOD per stained area (IOD/area; μm2) for positive staining.

Western blot

Protein lysates were prepared with radioimmunoprecipitation plus buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China) supplemented with phenylmethane sulfonyl fluoride (Solarbio). Briefly, 50 μg of total protein as determined with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was electrophoretically separated on a 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel (Beyotime) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). After being blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline-0.1% Tween 20 buffer, the membrane was incubated with a rabbit anti-NR2A antibody (1:800; Abcam), mouse anti-NR2B antibody (1:1200; Abcam), rabbit anti-NR2C antibody (1:400; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-NR2D antibody (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-BDNF antibody (1:1000; Abcam), or mouse anti-β-actin antibody (1:1000; Zhongshan Gold Bridge). The membrane was then incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000; Zhongshan Gold Bridge) and scanned with image acquisition and analysis software (UVP Bioimaging, Upland, CA, USA). The density of the bands was analyzed with ImageJ (Version 1.48d; NIH).

Cell culture

HT29 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cells were kept at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. HT29 cells were seeded in 6- or 12-well plates for 36 hours and serum-starved for 24 hours. Under serum starvation conditions, the cells were preincubated for 30 minutes with 10 μM MK-801 (Sigma Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada) or 10 μM Ro25-6981 (Tocris Bioscience, Ellisville, MO, USA) and then incubated for 24 hours with 100 μM NMDA (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 μM D-serine (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were harvested for the measurement of BDNF/proBDNF levels by Western blotting and/or quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

qPCR

Total RNA was isolated manually with an RNAprep pure cell/bacteria kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) and was reverse transcribed into cDNA with a ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT kit (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) in a Mastercycler thermal cycler (Bioer, Hangzhou, China). Then, qPCR was performed with SYBR® green real-time PCR master mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) in a real-time PCR instrument (StepOnePlus; Applied Biosystems, America). The primers for human BDNF were as follows: forward 5′-TGAGGACCAGAAAGTTCGGC-3′ and reverse 5′-GAGGCTCCAAAGGCACTTGA-3′. BDNF mRNA levels were calculated by the ΔΔCt method, normalized to human β-actin levels and expressed as fold-changes relative to the control.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software (version 19.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean values of quantitative variables were compared between the two groups by Student’s t-test. Data from multiple groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by multiple comparisons with Tukey tests. Correlations between protein levels were analyzed with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Correlations between protein levels and abdominal pain/discomfort scores were assessed by Spearman’s rank correlation. All data are presented as mean values ± standard deviations (SDs). Differences between means at a level of P ≤ 0.05 were considered to be significant.

Abbreviations

NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate; NMDARs: NMDA receptors; IBS-D: diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; proBDNF: the precursor of BDNF; mBDNF: mature BDNF.

Author contributions

Wenxue Zhang carried out the experimental work and drafted the manuscript, and Xiuli Zuo edited the manuscript. Wenxue Zhang, Dongyan Zhao and Xin Long evaluated the immunostained slides and cooperated in the experimental work. Wenxue Zhang, Qingqing Qi, Peng Wang and Lixiang Li conceived the study, participated in its design and edited the manuscript. Wenxue Zhang, Yueyue Li and Yanbo Yu collected clinical parameters for this study. Wenxue Zhang and Yiyuan Sun analyzed and interpreted the data. Xiuli Zuo and Yanqing Li provided infrastructural and financial support for this study. Zhen Li edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the participants. Many thanks to Feixue Chen, Ming Li, Lidong Xu, Xia Li, Mingming Zhang, Chuanguo Guo, Rui Ji and Chao Liu for their assistance.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81370495 and 81570485).

REFERENCES

1. Barbara G, Cremon C, Annese V, Basilisco G, Bazzoli F, Bellini M, Benedetti A, Benini L, Bossa F, Buldrini P, Cicala M, Cuomo R, Germana B, et al. Randomised controlled trial of mesalazine in IBS. Gut. 2016; 65:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308188.

2. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:712–21.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029.

3. Amouretti M, Le Pen C, Gaudin AF, Bommelaer G, Frexinos J, Ruszniewski P, Poynard T, Maurel F, Priol G, El Hasnaoui A. Impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2006; 30:241–6.

4. Hungin AP, Whorwell PJ, Tack J, Mearin F. The prevalence, patterns and impact of irritable bowel syndrome: an international survey of 40,000 subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 17:643–50.

5. Delvaux M. Role of visceral sensitivity in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2002; 51:i67–71.

6. Li F, Tsien JZ. Memory and the NMDA receptors. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:302–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr0902052.

7. Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, Hansen KB, Yuan H, Myers SJ, Dingledine R. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010; 62:405–96. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.109.002451.

8. Paoletti P, Bellone C, Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14:383–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3504.

9. Qi Q, Chen F, Zhang W, Wang P, Li Y, Zuo X. Colonic N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor contributes to visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 32:828–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13588.

10. Ferguson HJ, Wragg JW, Ward S, Heath VL, Ismail T, Bicknell R. Glutamate dependent NMDA receptor 2D is a novel angiogenic tumour endothelial marker in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:20440–54. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7812.

11. Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, Lu B. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010; 66:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035.

12. Teng KK, Hempstead BL. Neurotrophins and their receptors: signaling trios in complex biological systems. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004; 61:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3099-3.

13. Xia CM, Gulick MA, Yu SJ, Grider JR, Murthy KS, Kuemmerle JF, Akbarali HI, Qiao LY. Up-regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in primary afferent pathway regulates colon-to-bladder cross-sensitization in rat. J Neuroinflammation. 2012; 9:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-30.

14. Wang P, Du C, Chen FX, Li CQ, Yu YB, Han T, Akhtar S, Zuo XL, Tan XD, Li YQ. BDNF contributes to IBS-like colonic hypersensitivity via activating the enteroglia-nerve unit. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20320. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20320.

15. Yu YB, Zuo XL, Zhao QJ, Chen FX, Yang J, Dong YY, Wang P, Li YQ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor contributes to abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2012; 61:685–94. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300265.

16. Qiao LY, Gulick MA, Bowers J, Kuemmerle JF, Grider JR. Differential changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in rat primary afferent pathways with colitis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008; 20:928–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01119.x.

17. Chao MV, Bothwell M. Neurotrophins: to cleave or not to cleave. Neuron. 2002; 33:9–12.

18. Deinhardt K, Chao MV. Shaping neurons: Long and short range effects of mature and proBDNF signalling upon neuronal structure. Neuropharmacology. 2014; 76 Pt C:603–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.054.

19. Yang J, Siao CJ, Nagappan G, Marinic T, Jing D, McGrath K, Chen ZY, Mark W, Tessarollo L, Lee FS, Lu B, Hempstead BL. Neuronal release of proBDNF. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12:113–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2244.

20. Marler KJ, Poopalasundaram S, Broom ER, Wentzel C, Drescher U. Pro-neurotrophins secreted from retinal ganglion cell axons are necessary for ephrinA-p75NTR-mediated axon guidance. Neural Dev. 2010; 5:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-5-30.

21. Lu B, Nagappan G, Lu Y. BDNF and synaptic plasticity, cognitive function, and dysfunction. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014; 220:223–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45106-5_9.

22. LeMaistre JL, Sanders SA, Stobart MJ, Lu L, Knox JD, Anderson HD, Anderson CM. Coactivation of NMDA receptors by glutamate and D-serine induces dilation of isolated middle cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012; 32:537–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2011.161.

23. Autry AE, Adachi M, Nosyreva E, Na ES, Los MF, Cheng PF, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses. Nature. 2011; 475:91–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10130.

24. Fischer G, Mutel V, Trube G, Malherbe P, Kew JN, Mohacsi E, Heitz MP, Kemp JA. Ro 25-6981, a highly potent and selective blocker of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors containing the NR2B subunit. Characterization in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997; 283:1285–92.

25. Iafrati J, Orejarena MJ, Lassalle O, Bouamrane L, Gonzalez-Campo C, Chavis P. Reelin, an extracellular matrix protein linked to early onset psychiatric diseases, drives postnatal development of the prefrontal cortex via GluN2B-NMDARs and the mTOR pathway. Mol Psychiatry. 2014; 19:417–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.66.

26. Javitt DC, Zukin SR. Biexponential kinetics of [3H]MK-801 binding: evidence for access to closed and open N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channels. Mol Pharmacol. 1989; 35:387–93.

27. Seo JH, Fox JG, Peek RM Jr, Hagen SJ. N-methyl D-aspartate channels link ammonia and epithelial cell death mechanisms in Helicobacter pylori Infection. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141:2064–75. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.08.048.

28. Qi QQ, Chen FX, Zhao DY, Li LX, Wang P, Li YQ, Zuo XL. Colonic mucosal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mediated visceral hypersensitivity in a mouse model of irritable bowel syndrome. J Dig Dis. 2016; 17:448–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12374.

29. Canavan C, West J, Card T. Change in Quality of Life for Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome following Referral to a Gastroenterologist: A Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0139389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139389.

30. Li CY, Li SC. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in China: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21:2315–22. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i8.2315.

31. Tack J, Camilleri M, Chang L, Chey WD, Galligan JJ, Lacy BE, Muller-Lissner S, Quigley EM, Schuurkes J, De Maeyer JH, Stanghellini V. Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 35:745–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05011.x.

32. Van Outryve M, Milo R, Toussaint J, Van Eeghem P. “Prokinetic” treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a placebo-controlled study of cisapride. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991; 13:49–57.

33. Fan J, Wu X, Cao Z, Chen S, Owyang C, Li Y. Up-regulation of anterior cingulate cortex NR2B receptors contributes to visceral pain responses in rats. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136:1732–40.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.069.

34. Seidah NG, Benjannet S, Pareek S, Savaria D, Hamelin J, Goulet B, Laliberte J, Lazure C, Chretien M, Murphy RA. Cellular processing of the nerve growth factor precursor by the mammalian pro-protein convertases. Biochem J. 1996; 314:951–60.

35. Rodier M, Prigent-Tessier A, Bejot Y, Jacquin A, Mossiat C, Marie C, Garnier P. Exogenous t-PA administration increases hippocampal mature BDNF levels. plasmin- or NMDA-dependent mechanism? PLoS One. 2014; 9:e92416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092416.

36. Quirie A, Hervieu M, Garnier P, Demougeot C, Mossiat C, Bertrand N, Martin A, Marie C, Prigent-Tessier A. Comparative effect of treadmill exercise on mature BDNF production in control versus stroke rats. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e44218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044218.

37. Groth R, Aanonsen L. Spinal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) produces hyperalgesia in normal mice while antisense directed against either BDNF or trkB, prevent inflammation-induced hyperalgesia. Pain. 2002; 100:171–81.

38. Pezet S, McMahon SB. Neurotrophins: mediators and modulators of pain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006; 29:507–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112929.

39. Luo C, Zhong XL, Zhou FH, Li JY, Zhou P, Xu JM, Song B, Li CQ, Zhou XF, Dai RP. Peripheral Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor Precursor Regulates Pain as an Inflammatory Mediator. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:27171. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27171.

40. Zhou XF, Song XY, Zhong JH, Barati S, Zhou FH, Johnson SM. Distribution and localization of pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor-like immunoreactivity in the peripheral and central nervous system of the adult rat. J Neurochem. 2004; 91:704–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02775.x.

41. Hashmi F, Liu M, Shen S, Qiao LY. EXPRESS: Phospholipase C gamma mediates endogenous brain-derived neurotrophic factor - regulated calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in colitis - induced visceral pain. Mol Pain. 2016; 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806916657088.

42. Kay JC, Xia CM, Liu M, Shen S, Yu SJ, Chung C, Qiao LY. Endogenous PI3K/Akt and NMDAR act independently in the regulation of CREB activity in lumbosacral spinal cord in cystitis. Exp Neurol. 2013; 250:366–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.10.015.

43. Willert RP, Woolf CJ, Hobson AR, Delaney C, Thompson DG, Aziz Q. The development and maintenance of human visceral pain hypersensitivity is dependent on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126:683–92.

44. Wu X, Gao J, Yan J, Fan J, Owyang C, Li Y. Role for NMDA receptors in visceral nociceptive transmission in the anterior cingulate cortex of viscerally hypersensitive rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008; 294:G918-27. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00452.2007.

45. Fukuchi M, Tabuchi A, Kuwana Y, Watanabe S, Inoue M, Takasaki I, Izumi H, Tanaka A, Inoue R, Mori H, Komatsu H, Takemori H, Okuno H, et al. Neuromodulatory effect of Galphas- or Galphaq-coupled G-protein-coupled receptor on NMDA receptor selectively activates the NMDA receptor/Ca2+/calcineurin/cAMP response element-binding protein-regulated transcriptional coactivator 1 pathway to effectively induce brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in neurons. J Neurosci. 2015; 35:5606–24. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3650-14.2015.

46. Park H, Popescu A, Poo MM. Essential role of presynaptic NMDA receptors in activity-dependent BDNF secretion and corticostriatal LTP. Neuron. 2014; 84:1009–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.045.

47. Vanhoutte P, Bading H. Opposing roles of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in neuronal calcium signalling and BDNF gene regulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003; 13:366–71.

48. Liu M, Kay JC, Shen S, Qiao LY. Endogenous BDNF augments NMDA receptor phosphorylation in the spinal cord via PLCgamma, PKC, and PI3K/Akt pathways during colitis. J Neuroinflammation. 2015; 12:151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0371-z.

49. Boldyrev AA, Carpenter DO, Johnson P. Emerging evidence for a similar role of glutamate receptors in the nervous and immune systems. J Neurochem. 2005; 95:913–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03456.x.

50. Reijerkerk A, Kooij G, van der Pol SM, Leyen T, Lakeman K, van Het Hof B, Vivien D, de Vries HE. The NR1 subunit of NMDA receptor regulates monocyte transmigration through the brain endothelial cell barrier. J Neurochem. 2010; 113:447–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06598.x.

51. Rodrigo R, Cauli O, Boix J, ElMlili N, Agusti A, Felipo V. Role of NMDA receptors in acute liver failure and ammonia toxicity: therapeutical implications. Neurochem Int. 2009; 55:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2009.01.007.

52. Corsetti M, Van Oudenhove L, Tack J. The quest for biomarkers in IBS-where should it lead us? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 26:1669–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12475.

53. Barbara G. Mucosal barrier defects in irritable bowel syndrome. Who left the door open? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:1295–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00667.x.

54. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130:1480–91. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061.

55. Barbara G, Stanghellini V, De Giorgio R, Cremon C, Cottrell GS, Santini D, Pasquinelli G, Morselli-Labate AM, Grady EF, Bunnett NW, Collins SM, Corinaldesi R. Activated mast cells in proximity to colonic nerves correlate with abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126:693–702.

56. Hasan R, Srivastava G, Alyass A, Sharma R, Saraya A, Chattopadhyay TK, DattaGupta S, Walfish PG, Chauhan SS, Ralhan R. Prediction of recurrence free survival for esophageal cancer patients using a protein signature based risk model. Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 18. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10656. [Epub ahead of print].


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 24135