Research Papers:
Bayesian and frequentist analysis of an Austrian genome-wide association study of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas
PDF | HTML | Supplementary Files | How to cite
Metrics: PDF 1716 views | HTML 3592 views | ?
Abstract
Philipp Hofer1, Michael Hagmann2, Stefanie Brezina1, Erich Dolejsi2, Karl Mach3, Gernot Leeb3, Andreas Baierl4, Stephan Buch5, Hedwig Sutterlüty-Fall1, Judith Karner-Hanusch6, Michael M. Bergmann6, Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann6, Anton Stift6, Armin Gerger7, Katharina Rötzer7, Josef Karner8, Stefan Stättner8, Melanie Waldenberger9, Thomas Meitinger9, Konstantin Strauch9,10, Jakob Linseisen9, Christian Gieger9, Florian Frommlet2 and Andrea Gsur1
1Institute of Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Section for Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
3Hospital Oberpullendorf, Oberpullendorf, Austria
4Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
5University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
6Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
7Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
8Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Süd, Vienna, Austria
9Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
10Chair of Genetic Epidemiology, IBE, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
Correspondence to:
Andrea Gsur, email: [email protected]
Keywords: advanced colorectal adenomas; colorectal cancer; GWAS; model selection; MOSGWA
Received: July 26, 2017 Accepted: September 03, 2017 Published: October 09, 2017
ABSTRACT
Most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were analyzed using single marker tests in combination with stringent correction procedures for multiple testing. Thus, a substantial proportion of associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) remained undetected and may account for missing heritability in complex traits. Model selection procedures present a powerful alternative to identify associated SNPs in high-dimensional settings. In this GWAS including 1060 colorectal cancer cases, 689 cases of advanced colorectal adenomas and 4367 controls we pursued a dual approach to investigate genome-wide associations with disease risk applying both, single marker analysis and model selection based on the modified Bayesian information criterion, mBIC2, implemented in the software package MOSGWA. For different case-control comparisons, we report models including between 1-14 candidate SNPs. A genome-wide significant association of rs17659990 (P=5.43×10-9, DOCK3, chromosome 3p21.2) with colorectal cancer risk was observed. Furthermore, 56 SNPs known to influence susceptibility to colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma were tested in a hypothesis-driven approach and several of them were found to be relevant in our Austrian cohort. After correction for multiple testing (α=8.9×10-4), the most significant associations were observed for SNPs rs10505477 (P=6.08×10-4) and rs6983267 (P=7.35×10-4) of CASC8, rs3802842 (P=8.98×10-5, COLCA1,2), and rs12953717 (P=4.64×10-4, SMAD7). All previously unreported SNPs demand replication in additional samples. Reanalysis of existing GWAS datasets using model selection as tool to detect SNPs associated with a complex trait may present a promising resource to identify further genetic risk variants not only for colorectal cancer.
![Creative Commons License](/images/80x15.png)
PII: 21697