Research Papers:
Circulating epithelial cell counts for monitoring the therapeutic outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma
Metrics: PDF 1538 views | HTML 3436 views | ?
Abstract
Ching-Ping Tseng1,2,3,4, Kong-Kit Leong1, Miaw-Jene Liou5, Hsueh-Ling Hsu1, Hung-Chih Lin2, Yi-An Chen1 and Jen-Der Lin5
1Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
2Graduate Institute of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
3Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
5Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
Correspondence to:
Jen-Der Lin, email: [email protected]
Ching-Ping Tseng, email: [email protected]
Keywords: circulating epithelial cells, epithelial cell adhesion molecule, papillary thyroid carcinoma, podoplanin, therapeutic response
Received: May 01, 2017 Accepted: August 08, 2017 Published: August 24, 2017
ABSTRACT
Loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis usually leads to the death of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Whether or not circulating epithelial cells (CECs) count is a valuable marker in monitoring the therapeutic outcome of PTC was investigated. Patients with PTC (n=129) were treated in our medical center and were categorized into 4 groups with excellent (n=45), biochemical incomplete (n=15), indeterminate (n=37), and structural incomplete (n=32) responses. CECs were enriched from the peripheral blood by the PowerMag negative selection system. Three subtypes of CECs expressing epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR, a marker for thyroid cells), and podoplanin (PDPN, a marker related to poor prognosis in patients with PTC) were defined by immunofluorescence staining, respectively. The median number of CECs (cells/mL of blood) expressing EpCAM, TSHR, and PDPN was 23 (interquartile range 10-61), 19 (interquartile range 8-50), and 8 (interquartile range 3-22), respectively, for patients enrolled in this study. The number of EpCAM+-CECs, TSHR+-CECs, and PDPN+-CECs was statistically different among patients in different treatment response groups without interference from anti-thyroglobulin antibody (P<0.0001). Patients with structural incomplete response had higher counts for all three CECs subtypes when compared to other patients. EpCAM+-CECs was better in distinguishing patients with excellent response from structural incomplete response among the three subtypes of CECs. The sensitivity and specificity of the assay was 84.4% and 95.6%, respectively, when the cut off value was 39 EpCAM+-CECs/mL. CECs testing can supplement the current standard methods for monitoring the therapeutic outcome of PTC.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 20512