Research Papers:
DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1 is required for tetravalent chromium intermediate-induced DNA damage
Metrics: PDF 1858 views | HTML 2786 views | ?
Abstract
Timothy P. Wakeman1,2,*, Aimin Yang3,*, Naresh S. Dalal4, Rebecca J. Boohaker5, Qinghua Zeng5, Qiang Ding6 and Bo Xu1,2,5
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
2Department of Genetics, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
4Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
5Department of Oncology, The Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
6Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
*These authors have contributed equally to this work
Correspondence to:
Bo Xu, email: [email protected], [email protected]
Keywords: chromium exposure, Cr intermediates, carcinogenicity, DNA double-strand break, mismatch repair
Received: September 11, 2015 Accepted: May 22, 2017 Published: August 10, 2017
ABSTRACT
Hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) is associated with occupational lung cancer and poses a significant public health concern. When exposed to Cr[VI], cells rapidly internalize this compound and metabolize it to Cr[III]. Byproducts of Cr[VI] metabolism include unstable Cr[V] and Cr[IV] intermediates that are believed to be directly responsible for the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity caused by Cr[VI] exposure; however, the carcinogenic potential of the Cr intermediates and the mechanisms of Cr-induced carcinogenesis remain to be further defined. Utilizing synthetic Cr[IV] and Cr[V] compounds, we demonstrate here that Cr[IV] or Cr[V] exposure induces DNA double-strand breaks; however, of the two compounds, mammalian cells only respond to Cr[V]-induced DNA damage. Exposure to Cr[V], but not Cr[IV], results in initiation of cell cycle checkpoints and activates the ATM kinase, a critical regulator of the DNA damage response. Furthermore, cells exposed to Cr[IV] have significantly increased mutation frequencies in the HPRT gene compared to cells exposed to Cr[V], indicating that Cr[IV] possesses a higher mutagenic potential than Cr[V]. We also find that MLH1, a critical mismatch repair (MMR) protein, is required for activation of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in response to Cr[VI] exposure and to limit Cr-induced mutagenesis. Our results provide evidence for Cr[IV] as the ultimate mutagenic intermediate produced during Cr[VI] metabolism and indicate that functional MMR is crucial in the cellular response to chromium exposure.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 20150