Oncotarget

Clinical Research Papers:

Optimal treatment strategies for clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi _, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Seung Hyun Cho, Soo Jung Lee, Byung Woog Kang and Jong Gwang Kim

PDF  |  HTML  |  How to cite

Oncotarget. 2017; 8:100724-100733. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20121

Metrics: PDF 2041 views  |   HTML 2806 views  |   ?  


Abstract

Hye Jin Kim1, Gyu-Seog Choi1, Jun Seok Park1, Soo Yeun Park1, Seung Hyun Cho2, Soo Jung Lee3, Byung Woog Kang3 and Jong Gwang Kim3

1Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

2Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

3Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

Correspondence to:

Gyu-Seog Choi, email: [email protected]

Keywords: lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiation

Received: May 24, 2017     Accepted: July 29, 2017     Published: August 10, 2017

ABSTRACT

Background: Although lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis is a major cause of local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer, controversy still remains on the treatment of suspected LPN metastasis, “suspicious LPN”. We aimed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for suspicious LPN, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Materials and Methods: Of 377 patients who received preoperative CRT for rectal cancer between 2006 and 2013, 84 (22.3%) had suspicious LPNs on pretreatment MRI. Patients’ characteristics, MRI findings, operative and pathologic findings, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: Of 84 patients with suspicious LPNs, 61 showed good response to CRT on posttreatment MRI (short-axis LPN diameter < 5 mm). Among them, 31 patients underwent TME alone (group A), and 30 underwent TME plus LPND (group B). The remaining 23 patients had persistently suspicious LPNs on post-CRT MRI and underwent TME plus LPND (group C). Pathologic LPN metastasis was confirmed in five patients (16.7%) in group B and 15 (62.5%) in group C. Local recurrence developed in 7 (22.6%), 0 (0%), and 4 (17.4%) patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Five patients (16.1%) in group A developed in situ LPN recurrences. The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 53.7%, 74.2%, and 46.9% in groups A, B, and C, respectively.

Conclusions: Study findings suggested that LPND cannot be omitted for patients with suspicious LPNs on pretreatment MRI even with good response to CRT. Findings from pretreatment MRI should be considered to determine whether LPND is indicated.


Creative Commons License All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 20121