Research Papers:
Prognostic value of chemotherapy in addition to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in T3-4N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching study
PDF | HTML | Supplementary Files | How to cite
Metrics: PDF 1436 views | HTML 1789 views | ?
Abstract
Li-Rong Wu1, Hong-Liang Yu1, Ning Jiang1, Xue-Song Jiang1, Dan Zong1, Jing Wen1, Lei Huang1, Peng Xie1, Wei Chen1, Ting-Ting Wang1, Da-Yong Gu1, Peng-Wei Yan1, Li Yin1 and Xia He1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing 210009, China
Correspondence to:
Xia He, email: [email protected]
Keywords: nasopharyngeal carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, induction chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, prognosis
Received: April 05, 2017 Accepted: June 30, 2017 Published: August 07, 2017
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the contribution of induction (IC) or adjuvant (AC) chemotherapy additional to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with T3-4N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the era of intensity-modulate radiotherapy (IMRT).
Method and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed the data on 685 patients with newly diagnosed T3-4N0-1 NPC. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to match patients. Survival outcomes between different groups were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was adopted to establish independent prognostic factors.
Results: In total, 236 pairs were selected from the primary cohort. Univariate analysis revealed 3-year overall survival (OS) (90.8% vs. 90.3%, P = 0.820), distant failure-free survival (DFFS) (87.3% vs. 89.4%, P = 0.896) and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) (95.4% vs. 93.0%, P = 0.311) rates were comparable between CCRT plus IC/AC and CCRT alone groups. Multivariate analysis found that treatment group was not an independent prognostic factors for OS (HR, 0.964; 95% CI, 0.620-1.499; P = 0.869), DFFS (HR, 1.036; 95% CI, 0.626-1.714; P = 0.890) and LRFFS (HR, 0.670; 95% CI, 0.338-1.327; P = 0.250). Further subgroup analysis according to overall stage also obtained similar results.
Conclusion: Patients with T3-4N0-1 NPC receiving CCRT could not benefit from additional induction or adjuvant chemotherapy in the era of IMRT.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 20014