Abstract
Chunyu Liu1,2,*, Zhicai Zuo1,2,*, Panpan Zhu1,2,*, Zhixiang Zheng1,2,*, Xi Peng3, Jing Fang1,2, Hengmin Cui1,2, Yi Zhou4, Ping Ouyang2, Yi Geng2, Junliang Deng1,2 and Yu Sun2
1Key Laboratory of Animal Diseases and Environmental Hazards of Sichuan Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
2College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China
3College of Life Sciences, China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan, PR China
4Life Science Department, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, PR China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence to:
Jing Fang, email: [email protected]
Xi Peng, email: [email protected]
Keywords: aflatoxin B1, selenium, IgA+ cell, immunoglobulin, cecal tonsil
Received: February 06, 2017 Accepted: April 02, 2017 Published: April 13, 2017
ABSTRACT
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), the most common mycotoxin in human food and animal feed, produces hepatotoxic, genotoxic and immunosuppressive effects in multiple species. Selenium (Se) has emerged as an important element in the dietary prevention of various toxic agents. The present study was designed to scrutinize the protective effects of sodium selenite on the histological lesions and suppression of mucosal humoral response in the cecal tonsil generated by AFB1. A total of 156 one-day-old broilers were divided into four groups and fed on basal diet (control group), 0.6 mg/kg AFB1 (AFB1 group), 0.4 mg/kg Se supplement (+Se group), and 0.6 mg/kg AFB1 + 0.4 mg/kg Se supplement (AFB1+Se group) respectively for 21 days. Our results showed that 0.4 mg/kg Se supplement in broiler’s diets could improve the AFB1-induced histological lesions in the cecal tonsils including the depletion of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodules as well as the shedding of microvilli in the absorptive cells. Moreover, Se could restore the decreased number of IgA+ cells and expression levels of pIgR, IgA, IgG, and IgM mRNA induced by AFB1 to be close to those in the control group. These results demonstrated that 0.4 mg/kg supplemented dietary Se in the form of sodium selenite could protect the cecal tonsils from the histological lesions and suppression of the mucosal humoral response provoked by 0.6 mg/kg AFB1. Our study may provide new experimental evidences for better understanding of AFB1-induced damage of mucosal immunity and protective effect of Se against this toxin.
INTRODUCTION
Aflatoxins are mainly produced by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus and found in various agricultural commodities and many food products [1]. Among the aflatoxins identified, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is the most abundant toxic metabolite and a well-known global carcinogen, causing mutagenic, carcinogenic, teratogenic and immunosuppressive effects on human and multiple animal species [2]. AFB1 may interfere with the normal process of protein synthesis as well as inhibition of several metabolic systems thus causing damages to various organs [3, 4]. With respect to human, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies AFB1 within class 1 of human carcinogens [5].
The immunotoxic effects induced by AFB1 have been well documented in the literature, including innate immunity, cell-mediated and humoral response [1, 6, 7]. AFB1 has been shown to inhibit the development of thymus and bursa of Fabricius [8, 9], to depress the mitosis of B cells [10], to reduce the weight of lymphoid organs [11], to suppress antibody production [12–14] and to decrease the population and phagocytic capacity of macrophages [15].
Selenium (Se) is essential for the efficient and effective operation of many aspects of the immune system in both animals and humans [16]. Se supplementation has been found to regulate the function of B cells, T cells, neutrophils and NK cells [17]. Moreover, supplementation of Se in the form of sodium selenite was reported to have some protective action against the toxic effects of aflatoxin [11]. Early studies have revealed that Se could modify the disease process [18], and counteract the AFB1-induced adverse effects such as the retarded development and histopathological lesions of immune organs, reduced percentages of T cell subsets, along with decreased contents of antibodies [11, 13, 19, 20].
Cecal tonsils were the most immunologically mature lymphoid organ, being in the proximal one third of the paired tubular cecum, which laid along each side of the large intestine. More diffuse lymphoid tissue and unorganized lymphatic nodules were present both in the mucosa and submucosa [21]. Thus, cecal tonsils were the largest lymphoid organ of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue in avian [22] and played a crucial role in mucosal immunity. It has also been shown that cecal tonsils contain antibody-producing cells that direct humoral immune responses [23]. However, there were no systematic reports regarding the effect of AFB1 on the histology and mucosal humoral immunity of cecal tonsils along with the protective roles of Se against this toxin.
In the present research, experiments were conducted to examine the protective functions of dietary sodium selenite from the AFB1-induced histological lesions, and impaired mucosal humoral immunity of broiler’s cecal tonsils by determining the histological structure, the number of immunoglobulin A-positive (IgA+) cell and expression levels of immunoglobulin mRNA. The outcomes from the present research could provide helpful insights for therapeutic measures to bring down the AFB1-induced suppression of mucosal immune response in humans and animals.
RESULTS
Histological changes in the cecal tonsil
Microscopically, compared to the control group, no lesions were observed in the villi of cecal tonsils in the AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group and +Se group (Figure 1). However, the depletion of lymphocytes and presence of many vacuoles were visible in the lymphatic nodules in the AFB1 group, and no histological changes were observed in these places in the other three groups (Figure 2). Furthermore, the microscopic quantitative analysis also revealed a significant decline in the number of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodules in the AFB1 group (p < 0.01) at 7, 14 and 21 days of age compared with the other three groups, and no significant changes in these values occurred among the control group, AFB1+Se group and +Se group during the experiment (p > 0.05) (Figure 3).
Figure 1: Histological structure of the villi in the cecal tonsil at 21 days of age under light microscopy (H.E staining). Compared with the control group (A), no lesions were observed in the villi of the cecal tonsils in the AFB1 group (B), AFB1 +Se group (C) and +Se group (D). Bars = 100 μm.
Figure 2: Histological structure of the diffuse lymphoid tissue and lymphatic nodules in the lamina propria of the cecal tonsil at 21 days of age under light microscopy (H.E staining). (A) The control group. (B) The AFB1 group showing the depletion of lymphocytes and presence of many vacuoles (arrow) in the lymphatic nodules. (C) The AFB1+Se group. (D) The +Se group. Bars = 50 μm.
Figure 3: The number of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodules in the cecal tonsil. Note: Data are presented with the means ± standard deviation (n = 6). Letters A, B, C and D represent the significant difference (p < 0.01) between the group and control group, AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group, and +Se group, respectively. Letters a, b, c and d represent difference (p < 0.05) between the group and control group, AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group, and +Se group, respectively.
Ultrastructurally, a few absorptive cells in the AFB1 group showed the shedding of microvilli, reduced number of mitochondria cristae, decreased cytoplasmic electron density, presence of more myeloid bodies and absence of the cell connection at 21 days of age compared with the control group (Figure 4A, 4B). No ultrastructural lesions were seen in the AFB1+Se group and +Se group when compared with those of the control group (Figure 4C, 4D).
Figure 4: Ultrastructure of the absorptive cells in the cecal tonsil at 21 days of age under transmission electron microscopy. (A) The control group. (B) The AFB1 group. (C) The AFB1+Se group. (D) The +Se group. Bars = 3 μm. MV, microvilli; N, nucleus; G, goblet cell; M, mitochondrion; LY, lysosome; MB, myeloid body.
The number of IgA+ cells in the cecal tonsil
The IgA+ cells were mainly scattered in the core of the intestinal villi and in the diffuse lymphoid tissue and lymphatic nodules of the lamina propria. Exhibiting brown reaction in the cytoplasm, the IgA+ cells were round, oval and irregular in shape, and had scanty cytoplasm and pale stained nuclei (Figures 5, 6). Under light microscope, the decreased number of IgA+ cells were apparently seen in the AFB1 group when compared with the control group (Figure 5A, 5B and Figure 6A, 6B). The microscopic quantitative analysis also demonstrated that the numbers of IgA+ cells in the AFB1 group were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than those in the +Se group and AFB1+Se group from 7 to 21 days of age. Furthermore, compared to the control group, the values in the AFB1+Se group showed no significant changes (p > 0.05) throughout the experiment except at 7 days of age. In addition, no significant changes in the number of IgA+ cells were observed between the +Se group and control group during the experiment (p > 0.05) (Figure 7).
Figure 5: The IgA+ cells in the core of the villi of the cecal tonsil at 21 days of age in the control group (A), AFB1 group (B), AFB1+Se group (C), and +Se group (D) (immunohistochemistry staining). Bars = 50 μm.
Figure 6: The IgA+ cells in the diffuse lymphoid tissue and lymphatic nodules in the lamina propria of the cecal tonsil at 21 days of age in the control group (A), AFB1 group (B), AFB1+Se group (C), and +Se group (D) (immunohistochemistry staining). Bars = 50 μm.
Figure 7: The number of IgA+ cells in the cecal tonsil. Note: Data are presented with the means ± standard deviation (n = 6). Letters A, B, C and D represent the significant difference (p < 0.01) between the group and control group, AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group, and +Se group, respectively. Letters a, b, c and d represent difference (p < 0.05) between the group and control group, AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group, and +Se group, respectively.
The expression levels of IgG, IgA, IgM and pIgR mRNA in the cecal tonsil
The expression levels of IgG, IgA, IgM and pIgR mRNA are shown in Figure 8. A significant decline in the expression levels of IgG, IgA, IgM and pIgR mRNA in the AFB1 group (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05) at 14 and 21 days of age was noted compared with those in the control group and AFB1+Se group except for the IgG mRNA expression at 14 days of age which did not show significant changes (p > 0.05). These values in the AFB1+Se group showed no significant difference from those in the control group (p > 0.05) with the exception of IgA at 7 days, IgM and pIgR at 21 days which were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in these values were noted between the +Se group and control group during the experiment (p > 0.05).
Figure 8: The expression levels of IgG, IgA, IgM and pIgR mRNA in the cecal tonsil. Note: data are presented with the means ± standard deviation (n = 6). Letters A, B, C and D represent the significant difference (p < 0.01) between the group and control group, AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group, and +Se group, respectively. Letters a, b, c and d represent difference (p < 0.05) between the group and control group, AFB1 group, AFB1+Se group, and +Se group, respectively.
DISCUSSION
Cecal tonsil, on which nearly half of the lymph nodules are accumulated, is major lymphoid tissue in the avian cecum and is an important component in mucosal immune systems and provides important and unique immune function [24]. Moreover, this organ also has absorptive and digestive functions. In the present research, the depletion of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodules were demonstrated in the AFB1 group. Furthermore, the shedding of microvilli, reduced number of mitochondria cristae in the absorptive cells along with the absence of cell connection were also demonstrated in the AFB1 intoxicated broilers. It is well known that the function of cells is closely related to its structure. The lymphocytes in the mucosal lymphatic nodules of digestive tube play a crucial role in mucosal immunity. The functions of microvilli in the absorptive cells are to increase the absorptive areas and to promote digestion and absorption since the glycocalyx on the surface of microvilli contain a large number of enzymes, such as disaccharidase, dipeptidase and transpeptidase [25]. Mitochondria are the structure of energy production in cells, and the inside of each crista of mitochondria is studded with 8.5 nm particles involved in the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [25]. Cell attachment seals off the upper part of the epithelium and this mechanism prevents leakage of material from the lumen into the subepithelial space and vice versa [25]. Therefore, the depletion of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodules and ultrastructural lesions in the absorptive cells caused by AFB1 may eventually impair the normal function of the cecal tonsil. However, it is interesting to find that under light microscope, no shedding of the absorptive cells in the villi of cecal tonsils was observed in the AFB1 group, which is consistent with Ledoux’s report in the small intestine, when male broilers were exposed to 4 mg /kg AFB1 for 3 weeks [26]. However, this result is different from early researches in the jejunum in which the shedding of the absorptive cells occurred on the apical region of villi in the broilers exposure to 0.3 or 0.6 mg/kg AFB1 [27, 28]. This discrepancy may be related to the different segments of gastrointestinal tract or AFB1 concentration.
Antibodies, made and secreted by B cells, identify extracellular foreign material within the host and help to neutralize and dispose of it. In avian species, they belong to one of three classes: IgA, IgM and IgG (also called IgY) [29]. Being the predominant immunoglobulin isotype in the mucosal tissue, IgA provides mucosal immune protection as a result of its ability to be association with a transmembrane epithelial protein known as pIgR [30]. pIgR has the dual role of transporting locally produced dimeric IgA across mucosal epithelia, and serving as the precursor of secretory component, a glycoprotein that enhances the immune functions of sIgA [31]. sIgA serves as the first line of defense in protecting the intestinal epithelium from enteric toxins and pathogenic microorganisms [32]. Furthermore, IgM antibodies constitute the major component of the natural antibodies and is also the first class of antibodies produced during a primary antibody response [33]. And, IgG predominantly participates in the secondary immune response [34]. In the present study, the significant decrease in the number of IgA+ cells as well as expression levels of IgA, IgG, IgM, and pIgR mRNA at 14 and 21 days of age were observed in the AFB1 group, suggesting that 0.6 mg/kg dietary AFB1 caused the suppression of the mucosal humoral response in the broiler’s cecal tonsil. Similar results were also previously reported in the chicken’s small intestine and serum [14, 35]. However, a contrary result revealed that the serum IgA concentration in the AFB1-treated ducklings was significantly increased [36]. Thus, the effects of AFB1 on antibody production are not conclusive, which might be attributed to the dose, various organs, studied variables, duration of the experiment, and the species of animal/bird.
The cecal tonsil activity depends on the activity of bursa of Fabricius that is the site of B cell development and differentiation in birds [37, 38]. B cells migrate into the lamina propria and mature into IgA-, IgM- and IgG-containing plasma cells [39]. Early researches have demonstrated that AFB1 induced the suppression of development, lymphoid depletion, and a decrease of relative weight of bursa of Fabricius [8, 18, 40, 41]. Furthermore, IgA response is highly dependent on T cell function (CD4+ helper T cell) and related cytokines’ (IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6) help [42–44]. In addition, in the intestinal mucosa, pIgR expression, and hence IgA export depend on transcriptional enhancement by proinflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-4, interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [45, 46]. Recent studies have showed that the number of mature T cell subsets and expression levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IFN-γ and TNF-α mRNA were decreased in the small intestine and cecal tonsil of broiler induced by AFB1 [47, 48]. Finally, Aflatoxin has been found to inhibit RNA polymerase in vivo and subsequently to impair protein synthesis, and thereby could inhibit antibody production [49, 50]. Therefore, the decreased number of IgA+ cells and the expression levels of pIgR, IgA, IgG and IgM mRNA observed in the present research might be attributed to the impairment of the bursa of Fabricius, the reduction of T cells, the expression of these cytokines mRNA as well as inhibition of protein synthesis caused by AFB1.
Se is an essential trace element for humans and animals. It is generally accepted that this element is a crucial component of several vital metabolic pathways, the antioxidant defense system and the functioning of the immune system [51]. A growing number of evidence revealed that Se has emerged as an important element in the dietary prevention of various toxic agents [52, 53]. Se could inhibit gross and histopathological lesions in most of the organs induced by AFB1 [18]. Resent researches suggested that Se exerted its protective effects on the AFB1-induced changes in broiler’s immune system including the retarded development of spleen, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius [11, 19, 20], reduced percentages of T cell subsets in spleen and thymus [11, 20], decreased contents of serum immunoglobulin [19], lower number of IgA+ cells as well as the decreased contents of sIgA, IgA, IgG, and IgM in the ileum [13]. In the present study, no histological lesions were observed in the AFB1+Se group and +Se group. Furthermore, the number of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodules and IgA+ cells as well as the expression levels of IgA, IgG, IgM, and pIgR mRNA were significantly increased in the AFB1+Se group when compared with those in the AFB1 group, and no significant differences of these values were observed between the +Se group and control group. These results suggested that 0.4 mg/kg Se supplied with the diet could protect the cecal tonsil from the histological lesion, and the impaired humoral immunity induced by 0.6 mg/kg AFB1, in line with early reports in the immune organs, ileum and serum [11, 13, 19, 20]. The exact mechanisms of the protective role of Se on the suppression of humoral immune response of cecal tonsils caused by AFB1 needs to elucidate by further research. However, it may be partially associated with following factors: (1) Se could improve the AFB1-induced impairment of bursa of Fabricius [19]; (2) Se could increase immunoglobulin synthesis and enhance B-cell function [54, 55]; (3) Se could enhance conjugation of aflatoxins thereby increasing excretion of aflatoxins [56], and repress the formation of AFB1-DNA adducts [57]; (4) the protective effect of Se was mediated through a cellular mechanism related to glutathione detoxification pathways [52].
From the present observation it can be concluded that 0.4 mg/kg Se supplied in the diets of broilers could protect the cecal tonsil from the histological lesions, and the suppression of mucosal humoral response induced by 0.6 mg/kg AFB1. The present results may be helpful for better understanding of the suppression of AFB1-induced mucosal immune response and protective effect of Se against this toxin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chickens and diets
One hundred and fifty-six one-day-old healthy avian broilers were purchased from a commercial rearing farm (Wenjiang poultry farm, Sichuan Province, China) and randomly divided into four groups, namely control group, AFB1 group (0.6 mg/kg AFB1), +Se group (0.4 mg/kg Se supplement), and AFB1+Se group (0.6 mg/kg AFB1+0.4 mg/kg Se supplement). Our previous studies showed that 0.6 mg/kg AFB1 in the diet had obvious adverse effects on broilers, and appropriate dosage of Se (0.4 mg/kg) supplied in the diet could provide optimal protective effects against AFB1-induced toxicity in broilers [14, 20, 58]. Based on these researches, toxin concentration (0.6 mg/kg AFB1) and supplemented Se level (0.4 mg/kg) were chosen, and sodium selenite was selected as a source of supplemented Se. AFB1 was obtained from Pribolab Pte. Ltd. (Singapore, MSS1003). 27 mg AFB1 was completely dissolved in 30 mL methanol and then the 30 mL mixture was mixed into the 45 kg corn-soybean basal diet to formulate the AFB1 diet of experimental groups containing 0.6 mg/kg AFB1. The equivalent methanol was mixed into the corn-soybean basal diet to produce the control diet. Then, the methanol of diets was evaporated at 98 °F (37°C). 1% Feed-grade sodium selenite was mixed into the control diet to formulate +Se and AFB1+Se diets containing 0.4 mg/kg Se supplement by a stepwise dilution method. The content of Se (0.332 mg/kg) in the control diet was analyzed by hydride-generation atomic absorption spectroscopy. After preparing the diet, the diets of four groups were analyzed by HPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and fluorescence detector (Waters Model 2475, Milford) method to ensure the AFB1 concentration in the diets. AFB1 content was 0.601 mg/kg in the contaminated diet and less than 0.001 mg/kg in the control diet and +Se group. Broilers were provided with drinking water as well as the aforementioned diets ad libitum for 21 days. The use of broilers and all experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Sichuan Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee. Nutritional requirements were adequate according to the National Research Council (1994) (National Research Council, 1994) [59] and Chinese Feeding Standard of Chicken (NY/ T33-2004).
Histological examination by H.E. staining
At the end of 7, 14 and 21 days of experiment, six chickens in each group were euthanized, and cecal tonsils were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After fixation for 24 h, tissues were dehydrated, paraffin embedded, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H.E) for histological examination. Paraffin sections were also collected to perform immunohistochemistry. The histological structures of the tissues were observed and photographed with a computer supported image system connected to a light microscope (Nikon eclipse 55i, Tokyo, Japan). The number of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodule was evaluated using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA) image analysis software. For each sample, six random fields of 0.0025 mm2 in the lymphatic nodules were quantified, respectively. Results were expressed as the average number of lymphocytes in the lymphatic nodule per 0.0025 mm2 area.
Ultrastructral examination by transmission electron microscopy
For the transmission electron microscope (TEM) examination, at the end of 21 days of experiment, the cecal tonsils of three chickens in each group were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 24 h at 4°C, respectively. The specimens were washed 3 times in PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. After dehydration in a graded series of acetone, they were embedded in Epon 812. Ultrathin sections were cut and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined in a Hitachi H–600 TEM (Japan).
The IgA+ cells by immunohistochemistry
According to the method described by Liu et al. [39], the paraffin sections of cecal tonsils were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, washed in distilled water and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then blocked for endogenous peroxidase by incubation with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 15 min. The sections were subjected to antigen retrieval procedure by microwaving in 0.01 M pH 6.0 sodium citrate buffer. Additional washing in PBS was performed before the next 30 min of incubation at 37°C in 10% normal goat serum. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the diluted (1:100) primary antibodies (polyclonal mouse anti-chicken IgA heavy chains) (CAT NO. S8330-01, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA). After washing in PBS, the sections were exposed to 1% biotinylated secondary antibody goat antimouse IgG (CAT NO. BA 1050, Boster, Wuhan, China) for 1 h at 37°C. The sections were then incubated with strept avidin-biotin complex (CAT NO. SA 1053, Boster, Wuhan, China) for 30 min at 37°C. To visualize the immunoreaction, the sections were immersed in diaminobenzidine hydrochloride. The sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene and mounted. For the negative controls, representative sections were processed in the same way by replacing primary antibodies by PBS. The stained sections were photographed with a computer supported image system connected to a light microscope (Nikon eclipse 55i, Tokyo, Japan). The number of the IgA+ cells was evaluated using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD) image analysis software. For each sample, six random fields of 0.064 mm2 were quantified (corresponding approximately to six fields at × 400 magnification), respectively. Results were expressed as the average of IgA+ cells per 0.064 mm2 area.
The expression levels of IgA, pIgR, IgM and IgG mRNA by qRT-PCR
According to the methods described by Wu et al. [24], the expression levels of IgA, pIgR, IgM and IgG mRNA were determined. At 7, 14 and 21 days of the experiment, the cecal tonsils from six chickens in each group were stored in liquid nitrogen, respectively. After adding liquid nitrogen, the cecal tonsils were crushed with a pestle into powder and filled into EP tubes immediately, then stored at −70°C for future usage. Total RNA was extracted from the powder by TriPure isolation reagent (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The quality of RNA (A260/A280) was 1.6–2.0 by spectrophotometric analysis and equalized by dilution in RNAase-free water. The mRNA was then reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using Transcription First Strand cDNA Synthesis (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The cDNA was used as a template for qRT-PCR.
For qRT-PCR reactions, 20 μL mixtures were made by using FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) containing 10 μL FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX), 0.6 μL forward, 0.6 μL reverse primer, 6.8 μL RNAase-free water and 2 μL cDNA. Reaction conditions were set to 10 min at 95°C (first segment, one cycle), 10 s at 95°C and 30 s at Tm of a specific primer pair (second segment, 44 cycles) followed by 10 s at 95°C, and 72°C for 10 s (dissociation curve segment) using a Thermal Cycler (Step One Plus, Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA). Gene expression was analyzed, and β-actin was used as an internal control gene [60, 61]. Sequence of primers was obtained from GenBank of NCBI. Primers were designed with Primer 5 and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) (Table 1). The control broilers responses (mRNA amount) were as reference values for between groups comparison within the same control day in each week, respectively. The qRT-PCR data were analyzed with 2−ΔΔCt calculation method of Livak and Schmittgen [62].
Table 1: Primer sequences, corresponding accession numbers and sizes of the amplification products
Gene | Primer | Sequences (5′-3′) | Product size (bp) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IgA | F | TCGCTGGTATTGATGATGATG | 144 | S40610 |
R | AGTAGTAGGTGGCGGTGTCCT | |||
pIgR | F | ATGGCTCCGTTAGCATCAAGT | 103 | AY233381 |
R | ACCACAGTCAAGCAACTCCTG | |||
IgM | F | TCCTTCGTGGACATCTTCATC | 161 | X01613.1 |
R | GTGTAGAGGCCGTTGCTTTG | |||
IgG | F | CTTAGACGCCAAACTGAGGTG | 128 | X07174.1 |
R | CGTTGAAGTGTTCTTGGAGGA | |||
β-Actin | F | TGCTGTGTTCCCATCTATCG | 150 | L08165 |
R | TTGGTGACAATACCGTGTTCA |
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16.0 for windows. All parameters determined in this study were presented as mean ± standard deviation (X¯ ± SD). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance, and Dunnett T3 was employed for multiple comparisons. A probability value of p < 0.05 was considered to be difference, and p < 0.01 was considered to be significant difference.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUNDING
This work was supported by the program for Changjiang scholars, the University Innovative Research Team (IRT 0848) and the Education Department of Sichuan Province (2012FZ0066) and (2013FZ0072).
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Meissonnier GM, Pinton P, Laffitte J, Cossalter AM, Gong YY, Wild CP, Bertin G, Galtier P, Oswald IP. Immunotoxicity of aflatoxin B1: impairment of the cell-mediated response to vaccine antigen and modulation of cytokine expression. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008; 231:142–49.
2. Lakkawar AW, Chattopadhyay SK, Johri TS. Experimental aflatoxin B1 toxicosis in young rabbits-a clinical and patho-anatomical study. Slov Vet Res. 2004; 41:73–81.
3. Mohamed AM, Metwally NS. Antiaflatoxigenic activities of some plant aqueous extracts against aflatoxin-B1 induced renal and cardiac damage. J Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009; 4:1–16.
4. Wangikar PB, Dwivedi P, Sinha N, Sharma AK, Telang AG. Teratogenic effects in rabbits of simultaneous exposure to ochratoxin A and aflatoxin B1 with special reference to microscopic effects. Toxicology. 2005; 215:37–47.
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Aflatoxins: Natural occurring aflatoxinas (Group 1), aflatoxin M1 (Group 2B). IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, France. 1993; 56:445.
6. Cukrová V, Kurita N, Akao M. An early effect of aflatoxin B1 administered in vivo on the growth of bone marrow CFU-GM and the production of some cytokines in rats. Mycopathologia. 1992; 120:113–19.
7. Hinton DM, Myers MJ, Raybourne RA, Francke-Carroll S, Sotomayor RE, Shaddock J, Warbritton A, Chou MW. Immunotoxicity of aflatoxin B1 in rats: effects on lymphocytes and the inflammatory response in a chronic intermittent dosing study. Toxicol Sci. 2003; 73:362–77.
8. Sur E, Celik I. Effects of aflatoxin B1 on the development of the bursa of Fabricius and blood lymphocyte acid phosphatase of the chicken. Brit Poultry Sci. 2003; 44:558–66.
9. Reddy RV, Sharma RP. Effects of aflatoxin B1 on murine lymphocytic functions. Toxicology. 1989; 54:31–44.
10. Potchinsky MB, Bloom SE. Selective aflatoxin B1-induced sister chromatid exchanges and cytotoxicity in differentiating B and T lymphocytes in vivo. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1993; 21:87–94.
11. Chen K, Peng X, Fang J, Cui H, Zuo Z, Deng J, Chen Z, Geng Y, Lai W, Tang L. Effects of dietary selenium on histopathological changes and T cells of spleen in broilers exposed to aflatoxin B1. Inter J Env Res Pub Heal. 2014; 11:1904–13.
12. Okotieeboh GO, Kubena LF, Chinnah AD, Bailey CA. Effects of beta-carotene and canthaxanthin on aflatoxicosis in broilers. Poultry Sci. 1997; 76:1337–41.
13. He Y, Fang J, Peng X, Cui H, Zuo Z. Effects of sodium selenite on aflatoxin B1-induced decrease of ileal IgA+ cell numbers and immunoglobulin contents in broilers. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014; 160:49–55.
14. Jiang M, Fang J, Peng X, Cui H, Yu Z. Effect of aflatoxin B1 on IgA+ cell number and immunoglobulin mRNA expression in the intestine of broilers. Immunopharm Immunot. 2015; 37:450–7.
15. Raisuddin S, Singh KP, Zaidi SI, Saxena AK, Ray PK. Effects of aflatoxin on lymphoid cells of weanling rat. J Appl Toxicol. 1990; 10:245–50.
16. Arthur JR, Mckenzie RC, Beckett GJ. Selenium in the immune system. J Nutr. 2003; 133:1457S–9S.
17. Kiremidjian-Schumacher L, Roy M, Wishe HI, Cohen MW, Stotzky G. Regulation of cellular immune responses by selenium. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1992; 33:23–35.
18. Jakhar KK, Sadana JR. Sequential pathology of experimental aflatoxicosis in quail and the effect of selenium supplementation in modifying the disease process. Mycopathologia. 2004; 157:99–109.
19. Chen K, Fang J, Peng X, Cui H, Chen J, Wang F, Chen Z, Zuo Z, Deng J, Lai W. Effect of selenium supplementation on aflatoxin B1-induced histopathological lesions and apoptosis in bursa of Fabricius in broilers. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014; 74:91–7.
20. Chen K, Shu G, Peng X, Fang J, Cui H, Chen J, Wang F, Chen Z, Zuo Z, Deng J. Protective role of sodium selenite on histopathological lesions, decreased T-cell subsets and increased apoptosis of thymus in broilers intoxicated with aflatoxin B1. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013; 59:446–54.
21. Akter SH, Khan MZ, Jahan MR, Karim MR, Islam MR. Histomorphological study of the lymphoid tissues of broiler chickens. Bangl J Vet Med. 2006; 4:87–92.
22. Deng Y, Cui H, Peng X, Fang J, Zuo Z, Wang K, Cui W, Wu B. Changes of IgA+ cells and cytokines in the cecal tonsil of broilers fed on diets supplemented with vanadium. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012; 147:149–55.
23. Jeurissen SH, Janse EM, Koch G, Boer GF. Postnatal development of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues in chickens. Cell Tissue Res. 1989; 258:119–24.
24. Wu B, Cui H, Peng X, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J, Huang J. Dietary nickel chloride induces oxidative stress, apoptosis and alters Bax/Bcl-2 and caspase-3 mRNA expression in the cecal tonsil of broilers. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014; 63:18–29.
25. Jo AE, Brian LF. Dellmann’s Textbook of Veterinary Histology. Blackwell Publishing Professional. 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014, USA. 2006; 9:14–6.
26. Ledoux DR, Rottinghaus GE, Bermudez AJ, Alonsodebolt M. Efficacy of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate to ameliorate the toxic effects of aflatoxin in broiler chicks. Poultry Sci. 1999; 78:204–10.
27. Yin H, Jiang M, Peng X, Cui H, Zhou Y, He M, Zuo Z, Ouyang P, Fan J, Fang J. The molecular mechanism of G2M cell cycle arrest induced by AFB1 in the jejunum. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:35592–606. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9594.
28. Zhang S, Peng X, Fang J, Cui H, Zuo Z, Chen Z. Effects of aflatoxin B1 exposure and sodium selenite supplementation on the histology, cell proliferation, and cell cycle of jejunum in broilers. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014; 160:32–40.
29. Hanly WC, Artwohl JE, Bennett BT. Review of polyclonal antibody production procedures in mammals and poultry. Ilar J. 1995; 37:93–118.
30. Mostov KE, Deitcher DL. Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor expressed in MDCK cells transcytoses IgA. Cell. 1986; 46:613–21.
31. Johansen FE, Kaetzel CS. Regulation of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and IgA transport: new advances in environmental factors that stimulate pIgR expression and its role in mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2011; 4:598–602.
32. Mantis NJ, Rol N, Corthésy B. Secretory IgA’s complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2011; 4:603–11.
33. Boes M. Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol Immunol. 2000; 37:1141–9.
34. Ratcliffe MJ. Antibodies, immunoglobulin genes and the bursa of Fabricius in chicken B cell development. Dev Comp Immunol. 2006; 30:101–18.
35. Giambrone JJ, Ewert DL, Wyatt RD, Eidson CS. Effect of aflatoxin on the humoral and cell-mediated immune systems of the chicken. Am J Vet Res. 1978; 39:305–8.
36. Wan XL, Yang ZB, Yang WR, Jiang SZ, Zhang GG, Johnston SL, Chi F. Toxicity of increasing aflatoxin B1 concentrations from contaminated corn with or without clay adsorbent supplementation in ducklings. Poultry Sci. 2013; 92:1244–53.
37. Surai PF, Dvorska JE, Diaz DE. Effects of mycotoxins on antioxidant status and immunity. The Mycotoxin Blue Book. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK. 2005; 93–137.
38. Rezaian M, Hamedi S. Histological study of the caecal tonsil in the cecum of 4–6 months old white leghorn chicks. Am J Animal Vet Sci. 2006; 2:50–4.
39. Liu J, Cui H, Xi P, Jing F, Zuo Z, Deng J, Wang H, Wu B, Deng Y, Wang K. Decreased IgA+ B cells population and IgA, IgG, IgM contents of the cecal tonsil induced by dietary high fluorine in broilers. Inter J Env Res Pub Heal. 2013; 10:1775–85.
40. Khatke PA, Singh R, Mandal AB, Tyagi PK. Ability of biological adsorbents to ameliorate aflatoxicosis in broiler chicken: effect on blood biochemicals and organ weights. Indian J Poult Sci. 2013; 48:117–21.
41. Ortatatli M, Oğuz H, Hatipoğlu F, Karaman M. Evaluation of pathological changes in broilers during chronic aflatoxin (50 and 100 ppb) and clinoptilolite exposure. Res Vet Sci. 2005; 78:61–8.
42. Mowat AM. Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003; 3:331–41.
43. Wittig B, Zeitz M. The gut as an organ of immunology. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003; 18:181–7.
44. Shang HF, Wang YY, Lai YN, Chiu WC, Yeh SL. Effects of arginine supplementation on mucosal immunity in rats with septic peritonitis. Clin Nutr. 2004; 23:561–9.
45. Lammers A, Wieland WH, Kruijt L, Jansma A, Straetemans T, Schots A, Den HG, Parmentier HK. Successive immunoglobulin and cytokine expression in the small intestine of juvenile chicken. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010; 34:1254–62.
46. Kaetzel CS. The polymeric immunoglobulin receptor: bridging innate and adaptive immune responses at mucosal surfaces. Immunol Rev. 2005; 206:83–99.
47. Liu C, Jiang M, Fang J, Peng X, Cui H. Inhibitory effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 on cytokines expression and T-cell subsets in the cecal tonsil of broiler chickens. Span J Agric Res. 2016; 14:e05SC03.
48. Jiang M, Peng X, Fang J, Cui H, Yu Z, Chen Z. Effects of aflatoxin B1 on T-cell subsets and mRNA expression of cytokines in the intestine of broilers. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16:6945–59.
49. Ghosh RC, Chauhan HV, Roy S. Immunosuppression in broilers under experimental aflatoxicosis. Br Vet J. 1990; 146:457–62.
50. Lafarge C, Frayssinet C. The reversibility of inhibition of RNA and DNA synthesis induced by aflatoxin in rat liver. A tentative explanation for carcinogenic mechanism. Int J Cancer. 1970; 6:74–83.
51. Gill H, Walker G. Selenium, immune function and resistance to viral infections. Nutr Diet. 2008; 65:S41–S7.
52. Uysal H, Agar G. Selenium protective activity against aflatoxin B1 adverse affects on Drosophila melanogaster. Braz Arch Biol Techn. 2005; 48:227–33.
53. Dorado RD, Porta EA, Aquino TM. Effects of dietary selenium on hepatic and renal tumorigenesis induced in rats by diethylnitrosamine. Hepatology. 1985; 5:1201–8.
54. Frost DV, Lish PM. Selenium in biology. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1975; 15:259–84.
55. Kukreja R, Khan A. Effect of selenium deficiency and its supplementation on DTH response, antibody forming cells and antibody titre. Indian J Exp Biol. 1998; 36:203–5.
56. Gregory JF, Edds GT. Effect of dietary selenium on the metabolism of aflatoxin B1 in turkeys. Food Chem Toxicol. 1984; 22:637–42.
57. Shi CY, Chua SC, Lee HP, Ong CN. Inhibition of aflatoxin B1-DNA binding and adduct formation by selenium in rats. Cancer Lett. 1994; 82:203–8.
58. Wang F, Shu G, Peng X, Fang J, Chen K, Cui H, Chen Z, Zuo Z, Deng J, Geng Y. Protective effects of sodium selenite against aflatoxin B1-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in broiler spleen. Inter J Env Res Pub Heal. 2013; 10:2834–44.
59. Dale N. National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Poultry–Ninth Revised Edition. J Appl Poultry Res. 1994; 3:101.
60. Brisbin JT, Zhou H, Gong J, Sabour P, Akbari MR, Haghighi HR, Hai Y, Clarke A, Sarson AJ, Sharif S. Gene expression profiling of chicken lymphoid cells after treatment with Lactobacillus acidophilus cellular components. Dev Comp Immunol. 2008; 32:563–74.
61. Zhao FQ, Zhang ZW, Yao HD, Wang LL, Liu T, Yu XY, Li S, Xu SW. Effects of cold stress on mRNA expression of immunoglobulin and cytokine in the small intestine of broilers. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 95:146–55.
62. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C (T)) method. Methods. 2001; 25:402–8.
