Research Papers:
HabibTM 4X-assisted resection versus clamp-crush resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-matching study
Metrics: PDF 1827 views | HTML 2901 views | ?
Abstract
Jiliang Qiu1,*, Weiqun Lu1,*, Nanrong Yu1, Guohua Yang1, Yi Li2, Zhiliang Huang1, Jianchang Li1, Kefei Li1, Houwei Xu1, Shicai Chen1, Xiang Zeng1 and Haiying Liu1
1 Department of Abdominal Oncosurgery, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
2 Department of Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, China
* These authors have contributed equally to this paper
Correspondence to:
Haiying Liu, email:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic resection, HabibTM 4X, clamp-crush, complication
Received: July 13, 2016 Accepted: December 01, 2016 Published: December 11, 2016
Abstract
Long term outcome of ablation-assisted hepatic resection is unclear for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study was scheduled to compare the outcome of Habib 4X ablation assisted resection (Habib group) with clamp-crush resection (CC group) for HCC. In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 81 patients from the Habib group and 103 patients from the CC group. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. Compared with the CC group, the Habib group had higher levels of γ-glutamyltransferase (P=0.044) and albumin (P=0.001), larger tumor sizes (P=0.007), shorter operation times (P=0.001), less blood loss (P=0.005), and less blood transfusions (P=0.038). There were no significant differences in complications (P=0.310), recurrence-free survival rates (RFS, P=0.112), or overall survival rates (OS, P=0.203) between the two groups. For the 67 patient pairs selected from the PSM analysis, the Habib group had better RFS and OS (P=0.033 and P=0.014, respectively). A Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that Habib-assisted resection was an independent factor for RFS and OS (P=0.008 and P=0.016, respectively). Furthermore, for the 42 patients with central and large tumors, the Habib group had better RFS and OS than the CC group (P=0.035 and P=0.038, respectively). However, the differences of RFS and OS (P=0.117 and P=0.126, respectively) were not significant among 92 patients with peripheral or small tumors. Hence, HabibTM 4X-assisted resection is safe and provides better survival for HCC patients, particularly those with central and large tumors.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 13906