Research Papers:
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 (HER4) is a favorable prognostic marker of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PDF | HTML | Supplementary Files | How to cite
Metrics: PDF 2581 views | HTML 2826 views | ?
Abstract
Jue Wang1, Jun Yin2, Qing Yang1, Feng Ding3, Xiao Chen1, Bingjie Li4, Xingsong Tian1
1Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
2Department of Systems Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
3Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China, Department of General Surgery, Jinan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
4Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
Correspondence to:
Xingsong Tian, email: [email protected]
Keywords: HER4/ErbB-4, breast cancer, meta-analysis, prognosis, marker
Received: June 21, 2016 Accepted: September 21, 2016 Published: October 05, 2016
ABSTRACT
Based on a large cohort of clinical studies involving a total of 8024 patients and reporting the effects of HER4 on breast cancer prognosis, we conducted the first meta-analysis and review of this type. We identified 26 studies published between 1985 and 2016 and assessed the prognostic value of HER4 in breast cancer by either real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, for mRNA levels) or immunohistochemistry (IHC, for protein levels). Elevated expression of HER4 was significantly associated with longer relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.63; CI: 0.48−0.83; P = 0.001, random effects). Further subgroup analysis showed that our results were stable irrespective of subtype [Luminal: HR = 0.40, CI: 0.30−0.53, P < 0.001, fixed effects; triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): HR = 0.49, CI: 0.26−0.90, P = 0.02, fixed effects; and HER2-positive: HR = 0.53, CI: 0.40−0.71, P < 0.001, fixed effects]. Cytoplasmic HER4 was more effective than nuclear HER4 (HR = 0.74, CI: 0.60−0.92, P = 0.007, fixed effects) for predicting RFS. HER4 was also found to be a favorable prognostic marker for overall survival (OS) among patients with non-TNBC in the subgroup analysis (Luminal: HR = 0.71, CI: 0.52−0.95, P = 0.023, fixed effects; HER2-positive: HR = 0.48, CI: 0.26−0.89, P = 0.020, fixed effects).
![Creative Commons License](/images/80x15.png)
PII: 12485