Research Papers:
Validation of the high-performance of pyrosequencing for clinical MGMT testing on a cohort of glioblastoma patients from a prospective dedicated multicentric trial
PDF | HTML | Supplementary Files | How to cite
Metrics: PDF 2246 views | HTML 3215 views | ?
Abstract
Véronique Quillien1, Audrey Lavenu2,3, François Ducray4,5, Marie-Odile Joly4,5, Olivier Chinot6, Frédéric Fina7, Marc Sanson8, Catherine Carpentier8, Lucie Karayan-Tapon9,10, Pierre Rivet10, Natacha Entz-Werle11,12, Michèle Legrain11, Emmanuèle Lechapt Zalcman13, Guenaelle Levallet13, Fabienne Escande14, Carole Ramirez14, Dan Chiforeanu15, Elodie Vauleon1, Dominique Figarella-Branger6,16
1Centre Eugène Marquis, F-35042 Rennes, France
2Université Rennes 1, Faculté de Médecine, F-35043 Rennes, France
3INSERM CIC 0203, Université de Rennes 1, F-35043 Rennes, France
4Hospices Civils de Lyon, F- 69394, Lyon, Cedex, France
5Université de Lyon1, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
6CHU Timone, F-13385 Marseille, France
7Faculté de Médecine Secteur Nord, F-13916 Marseille, France
8Sorbonne Universités UPMC Université Paris 06, INSERM CNRS, U1127, UMR 7225, ICM, F-75013 Paris, France
9INSERM U1084, Université de Poitiers, F-86021 Poitiers, France
10CHU de Poitiers, F-86021 Poitiers, France
11CHRU Hautepierre, F67098 Strasbourg, France
12EA 3430, Progression Tumorale et Microenvironnement, Approches Translationnelles et Épidémiologie, Université de Strasbourg, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
13CHU Caen, Département de Pathologie, F-14000 Caen, France
14CHRU de Lille, F-59037 Lille, France
15CHU de Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France
16INSERM U911 CRO2, Université de la Méditerranée, F-13385 Marseille, France
Correspondence to:
Véronique Quillien, email: [email protected]
Keywords: glioblastoma, prospective trial, MGMT, promoter methylation, pyrosequencing
Received: May 18, 2016 Accepted: July 28, 2016 Published: August 17, 2016
ABSTRACT
Background: The goal of this prospective multicentric trial was to validate a technique that allowed for MGMT promoter methylation analysis in routine clinical practice.
Methods: The MGMT status of 139 glioblastoma patients, whom had received standard first line treatment, was determined using pyrosequencing (PSQ) and a semi-quantitative Methylation-specific PCR (sqMS-PCR) method, using both frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded FFPE samples. Eight participating centers locally performed the analysis, including external quality controls.
Results: There was a strong correlation between results from FFPE and frozen samples. With cut-offs of 12% and 13%, 98% and 91% of samples were identically classified with PSQ and sqMS-PCR respectively. In 12% of cases frozen samples were excluded because they had a low percentage of tumor cells. In 5-6% of cases the analysis was not feasible on FFPE samples. The optimized risk cut-offs were higher in both techniques when using FFPE samples, in comparison to frozen samples. For sqMS-PCR, we validated a cut-off between 13-15% to dichotomize patients. For PSQ, patients with a low level of methylation (<= 8%) had a median progression-free survival under 9 months, as compared with more than 15.5 months for those with a level above 12%. For intermediate values (9-12%), more discordant results between FFPE and frozen samples were observed and there was not a clear benefit of temozolomide treatment, which indicated a “grey zone”.
Conclusions: MGMT status can reliably be investigated in local laboratories. PSQ is the ideal choice as proven by strong interlaboratory reproducibility, along with threshold agreements across independent studies.
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PII: 11322